I know how elections work, you don’t have to give me a long lecture about basic electoral procedures, and you are wrong about “a few thousand votes” changing the outcome. It would have to be a few hundred thousand in 2012. Just look at the swing state electoral results of the last election:
Colorado O 1,323,101 R 1,185,243
Ohio O 2,827,621 R 2,661,407
Pennsylvania O 2,990,274 R 2,680,434
Virginia O 1,971,820 R 1,822,522
Wisconsin O 1,620,985 R 1,407,966
Floria was super close, not decided for days, still massive difference: O 4,237,756 R 4,163,447
I see no solid court evidence of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes. Did not happen, just a coping strategy for people upset about losing election. All in favor of voter ID, it is just common sense and should have been implemented a century ago, but it is not going to magically result in election wins.
You asserted, in typical oligarch apologetics style, "I see no solid court evidence of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes." Of course you don't, shill, because court evidence would stop the massive cheating and the oligarchs would have to find another strategy to take over America. The cheating is done on a precinct level.
So by your shillery we should stop trying to get this massive voter fraud stopped because 'you' see no court cases involving hundreds of thousands of votes.
How many precincts are there in Virginia? How many fraudulent votes in 50% of those precincts would it take to total the margin of victory, keeping in mind that one fraudulent vote does more than merely cancel one legitimate vote for the opposite candidate. How many fraudulent votes would any one individual court case involve? ... There is a case where thousands of residencies are listed as UPS offices. But of course you wouldn't see any fraud there ...