Team Arpaio: Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Obama ID Fraud Investigation Presser Will Happen Soon

Carl Gallups ^ | May 1, 2014

[Sam Troy]

Carl Gallups: Spoke to Sheriff Arpaio's lead Obama investigator Mike Zullo last night... Two investigations still going on. The birth certificate investigation and the criminal investigation. Overwhelming amount of evidence pouring in. The release will happen sooner than later. The evidence is so overwhelming it will have to be dealt with.

[Coronal]

When they keep saying “We’ve got big news, we’ll release it soon”, and then put it off repeatedly, that is what they’re doing. They really ought to keep quiet until they’re ready to go.

[BurningOak]

I always wonder at peoples denial of basic reality.

There is a bunch of propaganda from both sides, but again, there was no voter fraud on a wide scale. It is a defensive denial tactics after losing an election. Liberals yell voter fraud after every election they lose. Obama did exactly as well as the average poll numbers suggested, there was no major surprises at all. Sure there were a few cases of voter fraud here and there, and they add up to like a hundred fake votes across the country. Not the hundreds of thousands that would be needed to swing the election.

If massive voter fraud happened, please show me news stories of convictions that add up to hundreds of thousands of fake votes in swing states. They don’t exist, its pure denial, just like birtherism.

[Huskerfan44]

Maybe “Sh!t or get off the pot” might work.

[MMaschin]

Who needs to impeach Obama?

All that needs to be done is show that he is a POS liar, and that the media are a bunch of leftist stooges.

It won't be as hard as you hope.

Articles are already coming out about how Hillary hates the media. Why? Because in it's love of Obama ( in who giving unconditional support made them feel so good about themselves) the media attacked and destroyed Hillary in 2008.

Half of Democrats were Hillary supporters. They WILL be able to see, when it's properly pointed out to them, how biased the media is towards the far left. And how the media destroyed their candidate, in order to elect their chosen candidate.

The real target is going to be the media. The Democratic party relies on the media to spin their deceit, and controll the ignorant masses. And when it is exposed, and can no longer provide this service, there is going to be civil war in the Democratic party, and it's going to be WONDERFUL to watch!

[MMaschin]

How old are you? You seem to be pretty ignorant of how the American system of government works! Are you a foreign Obot?

You don't need 'hundreds of thousands' of fraudulent votes to throw an election. In America we have what is called the Electoral College. Each states is allocated a number of electors based upon the number of US Senators, and US Representatives is has. Each state is responsible for choosing how it selects those electors. The actual Presidential election, is in Washington DC, and it is those electors who pick who the President will be.

In most states, when a person votes in a "Presidential election", they are actually voting for a group of electors that that candidate has selected. Since the candidate selected them, it's safe to assume that the elector will vote for that candidate. States can choose electors anyway they want, they could set up a paper-rock-scissors tournament if they wanted. But most allow the candidate with the most votes to select all of the states electors. Some allow the candidate to choose an equal percentage of electors to percentage of votes the candidate received.

There are VERY few swing states, and in those states there are swing precincts. Because of this, it doesn't take 'hundreds of thousands' of fraudulent votes to steal a close election, it only takes a few thousand in the right places. That is why the Democrats are so scared of Voter Id laws, it might deny them the few thousand fraudulent votes they need to steal a close election!

This will be the last response I write to you - atleast until you get zotted, and come up with some other moniker.

[Nero Germanicus]

I was responding to a post that suggested impeachment or resignation as options following the Cold Case Posse’s release of evidence.

So what you are suggesting is that Obama remains president but is exposed as a “POS liar.” I don’t find that to be a very satisfactory solution.

Hillary was bought off with Secretary of State and the promise to be next in line for the presidency. She went for it. The last thing Hillary wants is for Joe Biden already to be occupying the Oval Office.

[Seizethecarp]

I voted for Nixon on an absentee ballot that was handed out to me at Quantico Marine Corp OCS boot camp. They were keen on having the officer candidates vote for the (preferred) commander-in-chief. The choice between Nixon and McGovern was stark. I think I was the only recruit from MA in the candidate class...maybe for all of 1972! Some rules might have been bent to get me in, which might have accounted for me lasting only a month...due to not having the “right stuff” of a congenital variety...

But it was an amazing experience to spend that one month in Marine Corp OCS boot camp!

[Seizethecarp]

Reed Hayes is a Daubert-qualified document expert whose testimony has been accepted in many courts and whose report for Zullo is sealed.

Vogt cannot testify to Hayes credentials. Vogt does not know what is in Hayes’ report or what particular expertise Hayes is claiming in the report. Vogt has NOT been accepted as a Daubert-qualified document expert in any court, unlike Hayes, as far as I have seen.

[Seizethecarp]

“Continuing the Nixon historical analogy, Barry is unlikely to resign as long as there aren’t enough guilty votes that Senate Majority Whip Senator Dick Durban would be responsible for counting and reporting to the White House.”

Whether the Nixon analogy continues depends on whether the Arpaio evidence is “universe shattering” as claimed. If it is then Democrats will clamor to get Biden into office so as to then get Hillary in in 2016. Dems will throw Barry under the bus immediately if required to get Hillary in in 2016, IMO.

[Fledermaus]

Is Glen Beck on the team?

[Kenny Bunk]

The Nixon and Clinton impeachments are not at all germane.

Both came from INSIDE the government. Yeah, there was public pressure ... but nothing like "The Court of Public Opinion" the CCP and its partisans (I among them) are hoping for .... and which does not exist.

To reiterate, Sheriff Joe has a case that is all dressed up but with nowhere to go.

BTW, in re Nixon and Clinton, neither was convicted and only one resigned. Forget Obama. Concentrate on taking Congress in the Fall. Both Houses. Frankly, IMNVHO, it's worth more of my time to get Boehner out than it is to worry about the Pansy POTUS 'Prompter Jockey. He's out in '16.

[little jeremiah]

And the viewership (or viewerhood?) of MSM is shrinking daily. More and more people are getting sick of the shallow crap propaganda and lies. IMHO when the press conference does happen, the content will seep out no matter how hard the MSM tries to keep silent.

And it will have an affect.

[little jeremiah]

If massive voter fraud happened, please show me news stories of convictions that add up to hundreds of thousands of fake votes in swing states. They don’t exist, its pure denial, just like birtherism.

---

Liars such as yourself try to jivetalk people into thinking that you are reasonable but any half wit can see through your verbiage. Convictions? With judges who are often as corrupt as the elections officials? The articles were all over FR for many weeks after the election.

[Seizethecarp]

“To reiterate, Sheriff Joe has a case that is all dressed up but with nowhere to go.”

To reiterate, neither you nor I know what Arpaio’s new “universe shattering” case actually is!

[Nero Germanicus]

Nixon’s eventual resignation began as a failed burglary and Clinton’s impeachment began with the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit in Arkansas.

While individual Republicans might favor removing Obama from office, the Republican Party as an entity has no such interest. The Party wants to run against Obama’s record of abject failure and they want him to be the face of the Democrats in 2016.

The 1998 Senate Republicans thought that they could pull over a few Blue Dog Democrats to remove Clinton after the stain on the blue dress, the bald face lie (”I did not have sexual relations...”) and the cigar, but the Dems stuck together 100% and THEY managed to pull ten RINOs over to their side on perjury and five RINOs on obstruction.

[BurningOak]

I know how elections work, you don’t have to give me a long lecture about basic electoral procedures, and you are wrong about “a few thousand votes” changing the outcome. It would have to be a few hundred thousand in 2012. Just look at the swing state electoral results of the last election:

Colorado O 1,323,101 R 1,185,243
Ohio O 2,827,621 R 2,661,407
Pennsylvania O 2,990,274 R 2,680,434
Virginia O 1,971,820 R 1,822,522
Wisconsin O 1,620,985 R 1,407,966
Floria was super close, not decided for days, still massive difference: O 4,237,756 R 4,163,447

I see no solid court evidence of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes. Did not happen, just a coping strategy for people upset about losing election. All in favor of voter ID, it is just common sense and should have been implemented a century ago, but it is not going to magically result in election wins.

[BurningOak]

I know how elections work, you don’t have to give me a long lecture about basic electoral procedures, and you are wrong about “a few thousand votes” changing the outcome. It would have to be a few hundred thousand in 2012. Just look at the swing state electoral results of the last election:

Colorado O 1,323,101 R 1,185,243
Ohio O 2,827,621 R 2,661,407
Pennsylvania O 2,990,274 R 2,680,434
Virginia O 1,971,820 R 1,822,522
Wisconsin O 1,620,985 R 1,407,966
Floria was super close, not decided for days, still massive difference: O 4,237,756 R 4,163,447

I see no solid court evidence of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes. Did not happen, just a coping strategy for people upset about losing election. All in favor of voter ID, it is just common sense and should have been implemented a century ago, but it is not going to magically result in election wins.

[Fantasywriter]

So you get a choice of who to believe, Snopes or TruetheVote.

And you pick Snopes.

[BurningOak]

I pick common sense, although I am always open to evidence and proof otherwise. I don’t need people to think for me.

[MHGinTN]

There is a certain Carvile/Rovian stench about you ...

You asserted, in typical oligarch apologetics style, "I see no solid court evidence of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes." Of course you don't, shill, because court evidence would stop the massive cheating and the oligarchs would have to find another strategy to take over America. The cheating is done on a precinct level.

So by your shillery we should stop trying to get this massive voter fraud stopped because 'you' see no court cases involving hundreds of thousands of votes.

How many precincts are there in Virginia? How many fraudulent votes in 50% of those precincts would it take to total the margin of victory, keeping in mind that one fraudulent vote does more than merely cancel one legitimate vote for the opposite candidate. How many fraudulent votes would any one individual court case involve? ... There is a case where thousands of residencies are listed as UPS offices. But of course you wouldn't see any fraud there ...