Where is YOUR LINK sir?
You don't have one do you?
So you just stink up these threads with your imaginary "Palin is for amnesty" bullshit.
Congrats on being one of the finest hypocrites known on FR.
Once again, we've seen your stupid links, we've discussed them to show you where you are wrong ad nauseum.
Where is YOUR LINK sir?
You don't have one do you?
So you just stink up these threads with your imaginary "Palin is for amnesty" bullshit.
Congrats on being one of the finest hypocrites known on FR.
==========
CAN'T YOU KNOW that Palin is a "failed governor", and only interviews done with her 6 or 8 or 10 or 12 years ago are relevant today? Not something she said this week or last week.
At least this is what I'm told by self-important blathering boobs whose mental hard-drives have been infected with the "One-Term Governor Palin" Trojan virus (aka the "PDS virus").
Where is YOUR LINK sir?
You don't have one do you?
So you just stink up these threads with your imaginary "Palin is for amnesty" bullshit.
Congrats on being one of the finest hypocrites known on FR.What I like you about LakeShark, is that you don't have the slightest clue how to debate. At least provide something, anything to support your statement that she no longer support Register and stay in place.
You want my link, here it is again.
Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register them and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the registration and remaining in place.
You yourself intimated it was a horses ass policy when you stated it was actually McCain's policy, and she was just giving it lip service as a running mate. I told you I didn't believe she was making the case for 'the team', but that wasn't good enough for you. Most all of Free Republic dismissed the McCain/Kennedy bill as amensty even though they denied it. Palin's register and remain in place was a tenet of that bill. It was recognized even by you as a terrible bill, when you thought McCain was the one hawking it. But when a very bad tenet of the same bill is now adopted by Palin two years after the run for the presidency, all of a sudden you deny it's a form of Amnesty. Gosh, if you aren't a consistant one. /s
I also told you that Palin said she did not agree with amnesty. So did McCain. And yet you you say I lied when I said she was for amnesty. This is what I said on this thread. LINK Did I say she said she was for amnesty? No.
This is what I said with regard to amnesty. "In the interviews in question, Palin says she is against amnesty. Then she proceeds to suggest they need to be registered, and then they can stay."
Now, where did I say she favored amnesty? I said and continue to say she favors them registering and remaining in place inside our nation. That is a fact. And it's a fact that she said it in 2010.
I have proven my statement to be true.
When will you prove she has changed her policy since 2010?