Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
DoughyBoy wrote:

For a guy who claims to have been here since 1997, you really don't know much about the forum protocol do you.

We kind of invented it. I'm using a special forum protocol designed for disruptors and bullies like ash and Eschoir. Real old-school, it is. That's probably why you don't recognize it.

DoughyBoy wrote:

It is considered improper to talk about someone without linking them to the post.

Guess I forgot my hall pass, Mr. Hall Monitor. It is to laugh.

It's also considered improper to spam threads with the same garbage, over and over, even after the spammer has been shown to be wrong. Once again, "special protocol" takes over.

You're a spamming bully and disruptor. You should acknowledge that Bratch and Lakeshark have the right of the discussion, and cease and desist with the PDS behavior.

I'll let you have the Last Word on this thread, if it's a hat-tip to Bratch, Lakeshark, or both.

101 posted on 04/29/2014 8:24:45 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: kiryandil
DoughyBoy wrote: (1)

For a guy who claims to have been here since 1997, you really don't know much about the forum protocol do you.

We kind of invented it. I'm using a special forum protocol designed for disruptors and bullies like ash and Eschoir. Real old-school, it is. That's probably why you don't recognize it.  (2)

DoughyBoy wrote: (3)

It is considered improper to talk about someone without linking them to the post.

Guess I forgot my hall pass, Mr. Hall Monitor. It is to laugh. (4)

It's also considered improper to spam threads with the same garbage, over and over, even after the spammer has been shown to be wrong. (5) Once again, "special protocol" takes over. (6)

You're a spamming bully and disruptor. (7)  You should acknowledge that Bratch and Lakeshark have the right of the discussion, and cease and desist with the PDS behavior. (8)

I'll let you have the Last Word on this thread, if it's a hat-tip to Bratch, Lakeshark, or both. (9)


There it is.  Nine more insults and absurdities.  Information proving that Palin has changed her immigration policy?  Zero!  And yet, you say I have been proven wrong.  And you call me a spammer.

You have run your mouth down this thread proving nothing of substance and hurling insults each step of the way.

I said that Palin favored Registration and Staying in Place for illegal aliens.  I disagree with that policy.  Here is the link to her saying what here favored policy is.  Perhaps just once you'll listen to it.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register them and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the registration and remaining in place.

This is evidently the best way you know of to support your candidate.  I sure wouldn't pull this stunt on a thread about my candidate.  I would try to be factual, and act like an adult.

Maybe some day you'll grow up..


103 posted on 04/29/2014 8:49:29 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson