Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PALIN TO JEB BUSH: THEY'RE 'CALLED ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FOR A REASON'
Breitbart's Big Government ^ | April 28, 2013 | Tony Lee

Posted on 04/28/2014 10:46:56 AM PDT by Bratch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: DoughtyOne
DoughyBoy wrote:

For a guy who claims to have been here since 1997, you really don't know much about the forum protocol do you.

We kind of invented it. I'm using a special forum protocol designed for disruptors and bullies like ash and Eschoir. Real old-school, it is. That's probably why you don't recognize it.

DoughyBoy wrote:

It is considered improper to talk about someone without linking them to the post.

Guess I forgot my hall pass, Mr. Hall Monitor. It is to laugh.

It's also considered improper to spam threads with the same garbage, over and over, even after the spammer has been shown to be wrong. Once again, "special protocol" takes over.

You're a spamming bully and disruptor. You should acknowledge that Bratch and Lakeshark have the right of the discussion, and cease and desist with the PDS behavior.

I'll let you have the Last Word on this thread, if it's a hat-tip to Bratch, Lakeshark, or both.

101 posted on 04/29/2014 8:24:45 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Well done.


102 posted on 04/29/2014 8:25:22 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
DoughyBoy wrote: (1)

For a guy who claims to have been here since 1997, you really don't know much about the forum protocol do you.

We kind of invented it. I'm using a special forum protocol designed for disruptors and bullies like ash and Eschoir. Real old-school, it is. That's probably why you don't recognize it.  (2)

DoughyBoy wrote: (3)

It is considered improper to talk about someone without linking them to the post.

Guess I forgot my hall pass, Mr. Hall Monitor. It is to laugh. (4)

It's also considered improper to spam threads with the same garbage, over and over, even after the spammer has been shown to be wrong. (5) Once again, "special protocol" takes over. (6)

You're a spamming bully and disruptor. (7)  You should acknowledge that Bratch and Lakeshark have the right of the discussion, and cease and desist with the PDS behavior. (8)

I'll let you have the Last Word on this thread, if it's a hat-tip to Bratch, Lakeshark, or both. (9)


There it is.  Nine more insults and absurdities.  Information proving that Palin has changed her immigration policy?  Zero!  And yet, you say I have been proven wrong.  And you call me a spammer.

You have run your mouth down this thread proving nothing of substance and hurling insults each step of the way.

I said that Palin favored Registration and Staying in Place for illegal aliens.  I disagree with that policy.  Here is the link to her saying what here favored policy is.  Perhaps just once you'll listen to it.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register them and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the registration and remaining in place.

This is evidently the best way you know of to support your candidate.  I sure wouldn't pull this stunt on a thread about my candidate.  I would try to be factual, and act like an adult.

Maybe some day you'll grow up..


103 posted on 04/29/2014 8:49:29 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Information proving that Palin has changed her immigration policy? Zero!

Well, except that Bratch & Lakeshark posted Palin's immigration policy.

More spam.

104 posted on 04/29/2014 8:56:08 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Perhaps a link is in order here.

Go ahead. I’d love to read their posting of her changed immigration policy.


105 posted on 04/29/2014 9:02:31 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The DoughySpamminOne wrote:

Go ahead. I’d love to read their posting of her changed immigration policy.

You could try reading the thread title, spamboy:

PALIN TO JEB BUSH: THEY'RE 'CALLED ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FOR A REASON'

It's not an "act of love", is it? **snicker**

106 posted on 04/29/2014 9:20:28 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
That in no way addresses this:

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly.  I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register them and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work.  This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth.  She hadn't been his running mate for two years.  None the less, she's still hawking the registration and remaining in place.

More insults.  More evidence of stupidity.  More spaming the thread with nothing new, and not containing anything related to a new policy from Palin.

107 posted on 04/29/2014 9:24:19 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Check your keyboard. I think it's stuck.

Oh, and don't forget to read the thread title. :-)

108 posted on 04/29/2014 9:29:21 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
It's not ‘binding’ with Mexicans either... they know the score... so do we all. It would be the same with our deal...

We put out the word to several countries - they keep their side of the deal and we bring their parents and family over to enjoy the fruits of Americans labor too... Food stamps, housing, disability etc... Just like Democrats do...

Really sick, they're selling citizenship for votes... democrats don't give a damn about the ‘downtrodden’- you've been around long enough to know that's a line for the gullible...

109 posted on 04/29/2014 10:14:30 AM PDT by GOPJ ( Donald Sterling is a typical white liberal elite democrat - New York Times won't share that truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

The people being talked about are more properly ‘illegal interlopers’. If that term was used it just might get more people realizing what is happening.


110 posted on 04/29/2014 10:26:17 AM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson