Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilovesarah2012

The way they calculate these is a bit odd. The last time I looked at the list, there was a neighborhood in Jacksonville, FL listed, so I looked at it.

It wasn’t an entire zip code, just a section of the city that had a distinct geography. Further, it was mainly an abandoned commercial area in the middle of a rough part of the city. The only residents (<800) were in a single apartment complex at the corner, which was functionally part of a different neighborhood.

In short, a lot of drug deals were being made and going bad (and bodies dumped), but likely no more than in the surrounding areas, but the low number of residents made it jump way up by crimes per 1000.


13 posted on 04/27/2014 5:34:40 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan
my computer does not want to access the link, so I can only see what's on this thread.

The way they calculate is a bit odd

From what you describe, it is. A meaninful list would look for clusters of various crimes, and list the most saturated clusters as the most dangerous areas, whatever the population, zip code, or within one locality. Whatever the population is in those areas saturated with crime is doesn't really impact their danger. The population does not affect your safefy individually when you're in that area.

20 posted on 04/27/2014 5:57:45 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson