Not so much any more. Same old names, same old talkingpoints.
These programs used to set the topics for the coming week on the follow up news, barring any major news events. Now, they are just rehashes of talkingpoints. They don’t even really discuss the issues. Hosts are too busy trying to get ‘gotchas’ from the ‘enemies’ and furthering the leftist/lib/Dem agendas.
This morning, I will watch Pence. His name has been thrown around as a potential for 2016. I have seen him a few times from previous presidential election years. Warren might be interesting, but I wonder whether Georgie and TW has the intention of trying to derail her potential 2016 desires until Hillary decides.
I am concerning about how David Gregory’s psych eval is going. [/s] Rumors of his demise and being removed from MTP have been going on for several years now. But he is still host. Sometimes those kinds of rumors are spread to generate interest/viewership.
==
Hyped media of the week was apparently Clive Bundy’s statement. Since his comments were not quite clear enough, the NYT did some editing. How nice and considerate of them. [/s] Ironically or intentionally, their resulting edit made Bundy sound racist and calling for a return to slavery.
TEA* Party or GOPe?
If you are a RINO, don't. You RINO's have had your day in 1992 (GHW Bush), 1996 (Dole), 2008 (McCain) and 2012 (Romney). While GW Bush won in 2000, it was barely against the kook Algore, and beating Kerry shouldn't even had been close. Still, Bush won. But he's still much more RINO than TEA. And he helped ruin the brand, what with amnesty support and No Child Left Behind dealings with Tedward Kennedy. I won't even get into Afghanistan or Iraq because I supported kicking their asses but we never should have tried nation-building with them. Kick ass, kill bad guys, get out. Rinse, lather, repeat.
ANYWAYS, RINOs have had the contender role these past several elections and come up short. It's time to try a different type of challenger. TEA party, or TEA philosophy, at least.
TEA = Taxed Enough Already. It is not Tea, but rather TEA. Seriously that is what the TEA Party actually means.
“Since his comments were not quite clear enough, the NYT did some editing. “
Regarding not wasting time watching the G’ment propaganda. The N.Y. Slimes has been lying to everyone since at least the ‘30s when the Slimes and their Pulitzer reported praised Stalin’s great work in The Ukraine.
After all starving kulaks do not have Harvard or Princeton connections