Replies

The humor in all this is the ever omniscient, ever incredibly intelligent, in his own eyes blue one truly is in a monkey trap, and it's a trap of his own making.

The man lies in front of the world about some mythical "position" Palin holds, then goes off to congratulate himself on fooling people he actually believes read his asinine drivel.

He's never linked us to someone who actually has an immigration position as he claims she has, can't convince ANYONE she isn't against illegal immigration and its enablers, and after KNOWING he's been pwned, KNOWING he's lying, has never MANNED UP ABOUT HOW WRONG HE HAS BEEN.

You're totally correct that he's destroyed his reputation long ago, totally correct in showing how his "talking points" are from the totalitarian left.

I can't wait for him to continue in this trap, responding like a fool with the same post, while his sad, tired attempts to bring down a conservative champion fail.

I love this trap, it's pure genius.......it's Breitbart's mirror held up for all to see: "Those on the right who didn't come to the defense of Sarah Palin while she was being savaged were simply eunuchs. Those who participated in the savaging are animals that have no souls." Breitbart had it pegged perfectly, his quote is a perfect mirror for the blue deceiver.

One Palin Supporter: LINK

It reaches the point where I can't fail to address it any longer, my growing guilt at drawing the both of you out, letting you reveal yourselves for what you truly are inside.

Look at this thread. Nine days now, the two of you have been trying to cast me as the evil spawn of the devil. This in reaction to my attempt to point out Palin's flawed immigration plan, and provide an opportunity for you and others to explain that it changed. You could have linked me to a place where it reveals she no longer supports Registration and Remaining in Place. Insults were all I received in return on this thread. Hey, that's okay. It tells me and others what at least two people think is reasoned in support of their candidate. I tells me and others what at least two of you are willing to do in her name, to someone who merely begs the question. Do you agree with the resultant damage Registering and allowing 20-35 million illegal immigrants to Remain in Place would cause this nation?

I remain fixed on the question. You remain fixed on growing ever more wild in your objections.

Insults, lies, denigration, crudeness, vulgarity, vulgarity in direct connection to your candidate's name... this is the true you. Monkey trap? This is your intellectual response to a person pointing out your candidate's policy, delivered in her own words in a public interview on FoxNews channel?

LakeShark, you stated that Palin only said this in support of John McCain, in her capacity as his running mate. You obviously didn't agree with it, or you would have said, "Yes, and I agree with her plan." It was objectionable and you know it. So once I made it clear the plan was truly her plan two years after running with McCain, you suddenly grew silent on the issue. And then after long silence on it, you tried to cast it off as something from four years ago. You were the one who said she changed her mind. I have asked you to provide a link to evidence of that, and you have refused to do it. Either that or you can't do it, and have been caught in yet another falsehood.

There is no shame in either of you. This is the level of intellect the two of you have progressed to in adult-hood, and that's the long and short of it.

It almost borders abuse drawing the both of you out, but then folks just as well know who they are dealing with. I don't have to compare you to others. It makes no difference that the Palestinians go the monkey route when talking about the Israelis. You folks wouldn't grasp the significance of adopting their disinformation techniques. The desparation of this act would be lost on you. It probably wouldn't be on many others.

There is one good thing I will say about Palin. She does not deserve the guilt of association you two would garner for her if your behavior were widely seen. I believe her to be a decent person, someone I disagree with on at least one issue of policy. I do not see her as a person that would act the way the two of you have, if someone disagreed with her. She would accept the disagreement and move on as most adults would.

She certainly wouldn't behave as you two have.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

Lakeshark wrote: it's Breitbart's mirror held up for all to see: "Those on the right who didn't come to the defense of Sarah Palin while she was being savaged were simply eunuchs. Those who participated in the savaging are animals that have no souls."

Thanks for posting that quote.

It should serve to remind us that Tina Fey and the Left-wing scum who think like her can "see" Palin's imaginary "immigration policy" from their foetid California Commie swamps.

And that if foul excrement from the Left like "a failed half term governor" appears on Free Republic, we're not going to be eunuchs. We're going to slap it down as hard as we can.

And we're also going to slap down supposed "Freepers" who create "straw positions" and "straw policies" for conservative leaders that they dislike.