Why is Texas no going after the land for the owner who had his stolen 30 years ago?
They tried to get him to file some sort of paper work, to let him use it or something (it wasn't clear to me exactly what in the interview), but he didn't. Apparently didn't appeal the decision either.
Meanwhile the land has basically just been there, with whoever wants doing whatever.
I have had no luck trying to find any court documents giving the judge's reasoning on that case.