Even our own solar system is not fine tuned for life.
From the article The Exceptional Nature of Our Sun,:
It is true that only about half a billionth of the suns energy output reaches our planet. Yet, even those few crumbs from the solar table are enough to nourish and sustain life on earth. Not only that, but if this tiny trickle that arrives could be harnessed efficiently, it could easily meet the energy needs of our modern society, with power to spare.
Most astronomy books say that our sun is an ordinary star, a rather commonplace celestial object. But is the sun in every respect a commonplace celestial object? Guillermo Gonzalez, an astronomer at the University of Washington in Seattle, has suggested that our sun is exceptional. Should this affect the search for life on other planets? Gonzalez answers: There are fewer stars suitable for intelligent life than people realise. He adds: Unless astronomers narrow down their search to stars as exceptional as the Sun, they are wasting much of their time.
What are some characteristics that make our sun suitable for nurturing life? As we examine these factors, we should keep in mind that many statements on the physics of the universe are theoretical in nature.
Some of the characteristics include:
1. The sun is a single star. The case of the sun as a single star seems, then, to be rather unusual, writes astronomer Kenneth J. H. Phillips in his book Guide to the Sun. That single status of the sun gives the earth a more stable orbit, which, in turn, makes for conditions that contribute to life on this globe, says Gonzalez.
2. The sun is also a massive star. Another related idiosyncrasy of the sun, according to Gonzalez, is that it is among the most massive 10 percent of stars in its neighbourhood, reports New Scientist magazine. Phillips notes: The sun contains 99.87% of the mass of the solar system and as a result gravitationally controls all bodies in the solar system. This characteristic allows for the earth to be relatively far from the sun93 million miles [150 million km]and still not pull away from it. This comparatively large distance, in turn, protects life on earth from being scorched by the sun.
3. The sun contains heavy elements. Gonzalez notes that the sun has 50 percent more heavy elementscarbon, nitrogen, oxygen, magnesium, silicon, and ironthan other stars of its age and type. In this, our sun stands out among its peers. The abundances of heavy elements in the sun are very low, says Phillips, but some stars . . . have even lower heavy-element abundances. In fact, stars that have heavy-element abundances like that of the sun belong to the specific category called Population I stars.
How does this relate to the existence of life on earth? Well, the heavy elements are necessary to support life. But they are rare, making up less than 1 percent of the universe. Our earth, though, consists almost entirely of the heavier elements. Why? Because, astronomers say, the earth orbits such an unusual home starour sun.
4. It has a less elliptic orbit. Another advantage arises from the suns being a Population I star. Population I stars are generally performing nearly circular orbits round the centre of the galaxy, says the book Guide to the Sun. The suns orbit is less elliptic than that of other stars of its age and type. Why would that affect the existence of life on earth? Because the circularity of the suns orbit prevents the sun from plunging into the inner galaxy, which is frequented by supernovas (exploding stars).
5. The sun has variation in brightness. Here lies another interesting fact about the star of our solar system. Compared with similar stars, the sun has significantly less variation in brightness. In other words, its luminosity is more stable and constant. Such a relatively stable output of light is critical for life on earth. Our very presence on the planet, says science historian Karl Hufbauer, is evidence that the suns luminosity is one of the more stable environmental factors.
6. The tilt of the suns orbit. The suns orbit is only slightly inclined to the galactic plane of the Milky Way. That means that the angle between the plane of the orbit of the sun and the plane of our galaxy is very small. How does this contribute to the welfare of life on earth? Far beyond the ends of our solar system, a vast spherical reservoir of comets, called the Oort cloud, surrounds us. Suppose that the inclination of the suns orbit to the galactic plane were greater. Then the sun would abruptly cross the plane of our galaxy, which could stir up the Oort cloud. What would the result be? The earth would be bombarded with a catastrophic rain of comets, say astronomers.
7. Solar eclipses: Of all the planets in the solar system (yes, I am counting Pluto) the Earth seems to be the only one that enjoys total eclipses. A solar eclipse occurs when the moon comes between the sun and the earth. To get a perfect overlap, the apparent sizes of the sun and the moon have to be roughly the same, so that the moon almost totally covers the sun. And this is exactly the case! Although the sun is 400 times bigger in diameter than the moon, it is also nearly 400 times farther away from the earth than is the moon. But the earths distance from the sunand thus the apparent size of the sunis more than simply a factor in the forming of a total eclipse. It is also a vital condition for the existence of life on earth.
If we were a little nearer or farther from the Sun, Gonzalez says, the Earth would be too hot or too cold and so uninhabitable. There is more. Earths unusually large moon helps life on this planet because its gravitational pull prevents the earth from wobbling around too much on its axis. Such wobbling would cause wild and catastrophic swings in climate. So to have life on earth, what is needed is an exact combination of the right distance between sun and earth as well as a moon of the right sizeand this on top of all the other considerations regarding the nature of the sun.
Why don't you make some points of your own, instead of just cutting and pasting other peoples' thoughts. I have no desire to Fisk through someone else's work.
The universe is not fine tuned for life, nor is our own solar system. Most of the solar system is uninhabitable (as are large sections of our own planet), and there's no evidence for it any life outside of our own solar system.
It's as if you found a smooth rock in the desert and deduced that the entire desert existed at the pleasure of the rock.
I'm amazed that people are impressed that we happen to live in a universe where life is possible.
What is the alternative? To live in a universe where life isn't possible?
Nice try.
I fail to see any refutation to my observation that even our own Solar System is not fine tuned for life, much less the whole cosmos.
For all the Sun's "specialness", we're still one planet of 8; a very small speck next to a solar giant.
I think it's crazy to think the Sun exists for our benefit.
I thought this one was interesting.
So in 4 billion years when the Andromeda Galaxy collision throws our solar system into the interior, or flings it out into outer space, will the Solar System still be "fine tuned for life"?
I guess fine tuning is relative to time, especially considering that intelligent life, or life capable of knowing it lives in a larger galaxy, has existed for such a short period of the universe as to almost be non-existent.
Some fine tuning...