Posted on 04/24/2014 12:06:57 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
It's a rather long process, but I'm happy with it. It took a few years of experimenting before I found a process that I was happy with.
/johnny
“, Despot Mike Bloomberg demanded a list from all landlords of the tenants who smoke in their apartments.”
Is that even legal? You know,that silly old fashioned thing called privacy.
.
/johnny
It’s a DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE.
Nothing in the proposed regulations prevents an ADULT from feeding their addiction 24/7, 365 days a year.
More to the point, I am curious if you have a purpose-built structure where you dry and cure your leaves. Also, how long does it take for you to dry and cure your leaves?
Maybe I’m old fashioned but I thought it was the parents’ responsibility to keep drugs from kids.
If something is legal to sell it’s not the government’s business who buys it.
.
And God help you if you grow any in your backyard.
Feds can pound sand.
/johnny
We have about a 60 day growing season here, and even in that it is likely to frost.
I don’t even know if it would grow here?
Tobacco can grow almost everywhere. It even grows well indoors.
/johnny
Trees is about all I can grow here.
I’m in the middle of a woods, stuff don’t get enough sunlight.
As I've ranted in similar threads, the problem is that parents have not been making sure that their children are being taught the federal government's constitutionally limited powers.
On a related note, I think that even conservative legal professionals, including justices, got indoctrinated in college instead of being taught the federal governments limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.
Not all of them contain any nicotine. Is Johnson & Johnson and the rest of big pharma (they are behind the push for all this regulation)required to put such a warning on their "nicotine delivery devices?"
How about caffeine, it's an addictive chemical, and one which is regularly sold to minors - should coffee and sodas have warning labels and age restrictions?
Comparing nicotine addiction to caffeine is a wining issue for vapids. I urge you to keep using it as they are very comparable and your argument resonates with the public.
I urge you to keep utilizing the words and arguments of the left, it works wonders on sites such as this. Keep up the good work.
Before the advent of the Ultra Nanny State tobacco was grown all around here in Wisconsin - I can assure you it is not bothered by short seasons or extreme cold. Now our corn goes into our gas tanks. Idiots rule!
Of course, they are safer, but we can't let them tell anyone that. Nicotine is addictive, yes, but only minimally harmful, akin to caffeine. It is the 3,000 other chemicals in tobacco cigarettes that give you lung cancer.
So the tobacco companies are behind this. $2 billion of e-cigarette sales are eating into coffin nail sales, so e-cigs must be held up while the tobacco industry re-gears to take over the budding e-cig industry ... using the heavy hand of the state get their way: registration of existing products, lawyers, paperwork, etc. K-Street is out in force for the tobacco industry on this.
Then, when RJR, Lorillard and B&W have an 80% market share, suddenly e-cigs will be safer and they will be called 'mild' and 'light'.
Just watch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.