Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Chip off the old blockhead.
1 posted on 04/23/2014 1:06:25 PM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Josh Painter

Runt Paul is a crapweasel libtardian, just like his old man!


56 posted on 04/23/2014 1:55:14 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Well, there you go.


59 posted on 04/23/2014 2:09:22 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter
"[T]he interesting thing is, if you look at the numbers, tax rates went down in the early '80s, tax revenue did rise," Paul said in a speech on April 30, 2009 in Lexington, KY. "The reason the deficits exploded is they ignored spending. Domestic spending went up at a greater clip under Reagan than it did under Carter."

Paul later responded to the Mother Jones piece with a statement: "I have always been and continue to be a great supporter of Ronald Reagan's tax cuts and the millions of jobs they created. Clearly spending during his tenure did not lessen, but he also had to contend with Democrat majorities in Congress."

How about trying to find out if what he says is right or wrong, rather than just jumping on him for heresy or lèse-majesté?

So far as I can tell domestic discretionary spending increased faster under Carter than under Reagan, but the deficit and the national debt did increase faster under Reagan than under Carter. Is that the way it was?

I don't know about overall spending or total domestic spending. Bear in mind, too, that Reagan served two terms to Carter's one, so someone looking at the total increase, rather than the rate of increase might mistakenly come up with some wrong conclusions.

Was Paul right or wrong on the specifics? Whether he was or not, the writer's outrage looks misplaced and exaggerated.

60 posted on 04/23/2014 2:23:18 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Something that bothers me about when people go after Reagan, is that they have the bruises and compromises, and flat out defeats of an actual real life 8 year presidency to cherry pick, and usually are using it to defend the campaign/position weakness of a candidate, who should be offering something closer to theoretical perfection.


61 posted on 04/23/2014 2:27:13 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

The nut does not fall far from the tree.


63 posted on 04/23/2014 2:29:04 PM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

Bah.

Other people will make up their own minds as they should, but for me, this marks the point at which Starship Rand Paul just blew up on the launchpad.


66 posted on 04/23/2014 2:49:51 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

This must be the “get rid of Rand Paul” day. One hit after another today. Most of the sources are left wing and, under most circumstances, would be ignored. Mother Jones??? Really??

Anyways, Rand Paul must be doing something right or the hits wouldn’t be coming so swiftly in the same time frame. Maybe, Jeb Bush’s announcement has something to do with it.

Anyways, I will listen carefully to Paul. The Rinos and Leftist sure don’t want him to run for President. Says a lot for him....now tuning in.....


67 posted on 04/23/2014 2:59:34 PM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty (Remember Brian Terry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter
Rand Paul Suggests Jimmy Carter Better Than Ronald REAGAN On Budget

Actually it may be true.

Many years ago Jimmah was the governor of Georgia and he was going around the nation giving presentations to other states about zero base budgeting. He was very knowledgeable about all of the intricacies of budgeting.

Jimmah was a great detail man, unfortunately the presidency is not a detail job. It's a leadership job.

78 posted on 04/23/2014 4:45:35 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Does the federal government qualify as a terrorist organization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josh Painter

It’s like he’s gone full retard.


83 posted on 04/23/2014 6:13:47 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson