Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: topher; BuckeyeTexan
It's actually a bit more complicated. Scalia's opinion for the majority does not hold that the Kentucky court was right to deny the defendant's Fifth Amendment claim. Rather, when a federal court is asked to overturn a state court's decision in a criminal case, the federal court must find not only that the state court was wrong, but also that its decision was "clearly unreasonable." Scalia said the Kentucky court's error wasn't that bad.
6 posted on 04/23/2014 12:26:41 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
I assure you, I had trouble following this case, reading the Scalia's decision.

I have a great deal of respect for Scalia based on this decision...

8 posted on 04/23/2014 12:32:05 PM PDT by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian
And he was absolutely correct: the court's only error was in not issuing an instruction on the question of self-incrimination during sentencing. That would seem to be a pretty thin reed on which to base a reversal.
9 posted on 04/23/2014 12:35:28 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: topher; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

27 posted on 04/23/2014 9:27:54 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson