Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake; ReaganÃœberAlles
The land rightfully belongs to the people - not to the government (state or federal). The Feds were supposed to manage the territory for the benefit of the people (not turtles), until statehood.

Once a state was admitted to the union, the Feds were to sell, offer as homesteads, and otherwise privatize the land, so that the people benefited. Any revenue raised could thus be used to pay Federal debts/contracts.

The current Federal “ownership” is unconstitutional. The Feds tried this with Missouri and several other states, but the states banded together and were successful in forcing the Feds to divest.

10 posted on 04/23/2014 7:05:07 AM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes

“The land rightfully belongs to the people”

By what right? Did the people buy it or inherit it? Did they conquer it? Of course if by “the people” you mean the people of the United States, not the people of an individual state, the answer to my last two questions is “yes”.

“not to the government (state or federal).”

We agree there.


16 posted on 04/23/2014 7:20:20 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the and breadth of "ignorance. individual be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson