Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xrmusn

Do you think she would carry to term if testing showed it had down’s? Or would she abort it and publicly brag about it?


37 posted on 04/22/2014 12:33:21 PM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: This I Wonder32460

My guess is she would abort the baby but call it spontaneous.

Trying to appeal to the most possible voters.

The Clintons have the pro-abort vote locked in and don’t need to prove their love for it.


38 posted on 04/22/2014 12:38:26 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: This I Wonder32460

I’m surprised they’re referring to it as an “unborn child”.

Of course, the inconsistency doesn’t phase them in the least.


48 posted on 04/22/2014 1:33:24 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: This I Wonder32460

Do you think she would carry to term if testing showed it had down’s? Or would she abort it and publicly brag about it
= = = = = = = = = = =
Well, we are talking about the Clintons here.

I guess it would depend on which way the ‘wind was blowing’ and which side of the fence they needed more.


50 posted on 04/22/2014 2:02:21 PM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98 --"I would agree with you BUT that would make both of us wrong".))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson