[Baynative]

I’m in a small minority that thinks the Supreme Court is ill equipped to make any decisions.

[B4Ranch]

Please remember that the Supreme Court has reversed more than 150 of earlier Supreme Court decisions on natural law. Is that what you would consider as someone being consistent and reliable in interpreting the Constitution?

“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, it’s meaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted. it means now”. So said the Supreme Court in South Carolina v United States in 1905

[Smedley]

“I’m in a small minority that thinks the Supreme Court is ill equipped to make any decisions.”

I’m an attorney. I assure you they’re less equipped than you think. They’re more politician than judge, and have a propensity to ignore the law when it suits them.