Obama lies, people die.
To: Jim Robinson
They’ll make your compliant plan Non-compliant with a stroke of the pen.
2 posted on
04/18/2014 11:42:53 AM PDT by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Jim Robinson
<>But the HHS rule would effectively ban them, overriding regulation that has up until now been the preserve of state governments.<>
It is absurd to think we still have a republic.
But hey, just keep voting every two years and our freedoms will be restored.
4 posted on
04/18/2014 11:50:46 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
(Obama has established executive branch precedents that no election can reverse.)
To: Jim Robinson
Change the “rules”? Whatever happened to “laws”, which fall under the scope of Congress and states?
6 posted on
04/18/2014 11:57:21 AM PDT by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
To: Jim Robinson
9 posted on
04/18/2014 12:05:22 PM PDT by
Dick Bachert
(Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
To: Jim Robinson
10 posted on
04/18/2014 12:08:14 PM PDT by
Dick Bachert
(Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
To: Jim Robinson
Fixed indemnity plans, which pay insured customers a set amount towards medical expenses and are often cost-effective relative to more comprehensive health insurance, are popular forms of coverage, and potentially becoming more popular in the wake of Obamacare. Health insurance industry representatives say that fixed indemnity plans have been attracting more interest as many Americans look for a way to mitigate against the high deductibles applicable to many insurance policies available on the Obamacare exchanges (fixed indemnity plans are not Obamacare-compliant, but they are seen by some consumers as pairing nicely with Obamacare-compliant insurance).
But the HHS rule would effectively ban them, overriding regulation that has up until now been the preserve of state governments. The rule would state that these plans can only be sold to consumers where that consumer also purchases Obamacare-compliant insurance.
PFL
12 posted on
04/18/2014 12:14:14 PM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: Jim Robinson
The rule would state that these plans can only be sold to consumers where that consumer also purchases Obamacare-compliant insurance.But paying the tax also makes a person "compliant" with the health care mandate, does it not?
13 posted on
04/18/2014 12:19:18 PM PDT by
Mygirlsmom
(No Mo (zilla). I'm going to the Opera instead.)
To: Jim Robinson
No one should be surprised that these Marxists are taking away freedom. It’s what Communists do.
To: Jim Robinson
You have to CANCEL MORE INSURANCE to get them to sign up for some insurance
16 posted on
04/18/2014 1:11:04 PM PDT by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Jim Robinson
Vote for whoever moves to cancel HHS.
18 posted on
04/18/2014 4:28:50 PM PDT by
PapaNew
To: Jim Robinson
20 posted on
04/18/2014 4:32:26 PM PDT by
4Liberty
(Optimal institutions - optimal economy.)
To: Jim Robinson
This is what I have called Cancer Jackpot insurance (actually it’s usually called Critical Illness Insurance). Bad news, you have cancer; Good news, you now have (at least) 50K to spend on deductibles, health insurance permiums, vacation, cocaine, hookers or anything else you want.
But seriously, it provides a little extra measure of security at a very scary & insecure time in people’s lives. And now HHS wants to take it away, because it’s a desired product, and the only way it can get more sign-ups for ObamaCare it to prohibit all actually valuable insurance products.
21 posted on
04/18/2014 7:00:34 PM PDT by
BCrago66
To: Jim Robinson
I hope that everyone that gets cancelled voted for Obama.
22 posted on
04/18/2014 8:46:12 PM PDT by
Din Maker
(Rand Paul, Rick Perry endorsed McConnell over Bevin. Neither will ever get my vote in 2016.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson