Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Diplomatic Dance with Putin is a Sad Sock Hop
Townhall.com ^ | April 18, 2014 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 04/18/2014 4:00:18 AM PDT by Kaslin

President Obama is right. He told Major Garrett of CBS this week that "Mr. Putin's decisions aren't just bad for Ukraine. Over the long term, they're going to be bad for Russia."

I believe that Putin's adventures in Russia's "near abroad" are a mistake. Indeed, they are part of a whole tapestry of wrongheadedness. It's also bad for the Kremlin to crush dissent, censor the news and hobble the economy by handing it over to oligarchs and a kleptocratic bureaucracy. Putin's scapegoating and demonizing of gays isn't only morally wrong, it's not in Russia's long-term interests either. That Putin prefers to use his oil and gas assets as a political weapon abroad and an excuse not to diversify his economy at home has me Googling the Russian word for "boneheaded."

But here's the thing: Putin disagrees. And on the matter of Ukraine -- like so much else -- he is immune to persuasion. All of the condemnations, communiqués, joint statements and other diplomatic lamentations, not to mention the late-night bull sessions on the phone with Obama, will not shake him from his views of what is best for Russia.

In a sense, arguing with the Russian bear is like arguing with a real bear. No matter how eloquently you explain to the bear that it should not eat your face, it's going to eat your face if it wants to eat your face -- that is, if you do nothing tangible to stop it.

Obama seems to think that's what he's been doing. He told CBS, "Each time Russia takes these kinds of steps that are designed to destabilize Ukraine and violate their sovereignty, there are going to be consequences."

Unfortunately, the credibility of Obama's "consequences" took a big hit when he was unwilling -- or unable -- to make good on his vow that the use of chemical weapons in Syria would amount to a "red line" for the U.S.

And then there are the consequences Putin has already faced as a result of his annexation of Crimea. The Obama administration did impose sanctions targeted at a few of Putin's henchmen and cronies. They publicly laughed them off, but it was worth a try.

Beyond that, though, Obama's consequences haven't even been inconsequential; they've had the opposite of their intended effect. Rather than send the Ukrainians weapons or useful intelligence, we sent them a bunch of MREs ("Meals Ready to Eat"). And even that we were unwilling to do in too provocative a way. We didn't use Air Force cargo planes, but rather sent the snacks in by civilian trucks. Meanwhile, pleas from allies to deploy more assets to Poland and other front-line NATO states were rebuffed by the White House.

On April 12, The Wall Street Journal reported that the White House was still weighing requests from the Ukrainian government for other supplies such as "medical kits, uniforms, boots and military socks."

"You want to calibrate your chest-thumps," a senior military official told the Journal, explaining this step-by-step approach. "He does something else in Ukraine, we release the socks."

Now, imagine you are Vladimir Putin. You illegally sent Russian soldiers without military insignia into Ukraine (a major violation of the Geneva Conventions). You lied about doing so at the time (Putin has since boasted that he did exactly that). And your aide brings in the news that a "senior military official" of the United States has announced that if you take another step toward carving up Ukraine, the U.S. will be forced to give the Ukrainians the socks they've been asking for.

Call me crazy, but I doubt the response will be "Comrades! Call it off! We can't take the chance that the Ukrainians will have warm, dry feet when we invade Kiev!"

Consequences that are not sufficiently painful or sufficiently scary aren't consequences in the sense Obama means at all. They're invitations. It's like trying to get a bear to leave you alone by throwing salmon at it.

I entirely understand that Americans are war-weary, and for good reason. But has it really gotten to the point where the U.S. military now defines "chest-thumping" as unleashing the socks of war?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: barack0bama; ukraine; vladimirputin

1 posted on 04/18/2014 4:00:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Putin's scapegoating and demonizing of gays isn't only morally wrong, it's not in Russia's long-term interests either.

Yep, ya’ wanna’ build great culture ya’ gotta’ encourage sexual deviance. Hell, EVERYONE knows that...

2 posted on 04/18/2014 4:35:35 AM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

soetoro tells putin how the world works.

Now that’s funny!


3 posted on 04/18/2014 4:37:59 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Putin is a thug and Obama is a proven liar.


4 posted on 04/18/2014 4:54:45 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator ( 2+2 = V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama believes if he explains the “facts of life” to Putin, the latter will be chastened, become a good boy and mind his manners.

Putin scoffs at such naivete.


5 posted on 04/18/2014 5:04:21 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Putin would not behave that way if McCain were in office. Sadly no one will say it publicly because we eat our own.


6 posted on 04/18/2014 5:20:32 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If only Putin were a Republican the BLM would be rolling into Sevestapol.


7 posted on 04/18/2014 5:30:31 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Did any sane person ever think that our empty suit was a match for Putin? But the low information idiots thought he was a cool Black, and the university Communists were thrilled to have the first Communist president. How do we know that he and Putin aren’t working together…..that “flexibility” Obama mentioned on the open mic before the ‘12 election?


8 posted on 04/18/2014 5:41:47 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

That arrogant pos a match for Putin? Bwahahaha, now that is hilarious. He’s all talk with nothing behind


9 posted on 04/18/2014 6:00:16 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"I believe that Putin's adventures in Russia's "near abroad" are a mistake. Indeed, they are part of a whole tapestry of wrongheadedness. It's also bad for the Kremlin to crush dissent, censor the news and hobble the economy by handing it over to oligarchs and a kleptocratic bureaucracy. Putin's scapegoating and demonizing of gays isn't only morally wrong, it's not in Russia's long-term interests either. That Putin prefers to use his oil and gas assets as a political weapon abroad and an excuse not to diversify his economy at home has me Googling the Russian word for "boneheaded."

These words of obama in the mirror: below

I believe that Obama's adventures in America's "near abroad" are a mistake. Indeed, they are part of a whole tapestry of wrongheadedness. It's also bad for Washington to crush dissent, censor the news and hobble the economy by handing it over to Progressives and a kleptocratic bureaucracy. Obama's politicizing and aggrandizing of gays is morally wrong, it's not in America's long-term interests either. That Obama prefers to use his oil and gas assets as a political weapon in the U.S. and an excuse not to grow his economy at home has me Googling the English word for "boneheaded."

10 posted on 04/18/2014 6:05:03 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
He didn't behave that way with President Bush either. They respected each other and he would not behave that way with Romney either.

Sadly no one will say it publicly because we eat our own.

Yeah it's a shame what some in here do

11 posted on 04/18/2014 6:05:09 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

The last Crimean War wasn’t exactly a rousing success.


12 posted on 04/18/2014 6:30:42 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I didn’t care for McCain, but I did think he would be good for us on foreign policy. I voted for Sarah, so he got my vote too.


13 posted on 04/18/2014 6:37:15 AM PDT by Patriotic1 (Dic mihi solum facta, domina - Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

perfect!!!!


14 posted on 04/18/2014 6:55:44 AM PDT by georgia peach (georgia peach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Patriotic1

Yeah. I’m sure all his terrorist buddies in Syria would agree with you.


15 posted on 04/18/2014 9:53:15 PM PDT by Vote 4 Nixon (EAT...FISH...SLEEP...REDUX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson