[Resettozero]

Then again, after this disaster, she never went out in public again for months...

That is not true; she continued to make personal appearances and still does. Why are you so against her or challengers other than Lee Bright? Your comments about Nancy Mace, from time to time, have the same tone as those who have lobbied against Palin on FR (basically for being a woman). You just are not being fair toward Nancy Mace or other challengers, although your advocacy of Lee Bright has been paramount. Why?

I had not read this biased article you linked until today. But I have seen (heard) the interview shortly after it was given. It was NOT a disaster for her (although the article IS) and her response to “How is your soul?” wasn't great but it was discussed at that time and since then on several FR threads. Stupid question designed to trip up someone who doesn't already know Beck will usually throw it in.

GLEN BECK? As an interviewer of women, such as Sarah Palin and Nancy Mace, he is not and never was much good at it; skittish, unsure of himself.

As for the hit-piece article you linked: the writer's opinions did not represent the assessments of those I've spoken with in the Upstate, many of whom support Richard Cash.

[C. Edmund Wright]

I am a big Palin supporter and probably have about a 1000x the cred on her that you do. Mace is no Palin. Period. Not by a long shot. Palin and Beck are big friends and Beck is a big supporter of Palin. So your little attempt at analogy here does not fly.

And FTR, I do not support empty suits.

[C. Edmund Wright]

if you dn’t want to believe Glenn, how about Erickson:
http://www.redstate.com/2013/08/14/no-way-in-hell-will-i-support-nancy-mace/