Replies

I am a big Palin supporter and probably have about a 1000x the cred on her that you do. Mace is no Palin. Period. Not by a long shot. Palin and Beck are big friends and Beck is a big supporter of Palin. So your little attempt at analogy here does not fly.

And FTR, I do not support empty suits.

I am a big Palin supporter and probably have about a 1000x the cred on her that you do. Mace is no Palin. Period. Not by a long shot. Palin and Beck are big friends and Beck is a big supporter of Palin. So your little attempt at analogy here does not fly. And FTR, I do not support empty suits.

When he was still on FNC at 5 EST, Beck embarrassed himself in front of Palin and everyone who watched live or online delayed. Palin didn't know how to respond to his fawning over her and helped him stay on task and keep his show going that day.

The comparison to Palin and Mace was made because Beck has no idea how to approach an interview with strong-willed women, as both are, and bungled both interviews; as if his mind kept wandering. My comparison, which was not an analogy, withstands you Alinskyish assault.

Your response, "I do not support empty suits" does not answer WHY you bad-mouth challengers to Graham on FR, especially Nancy Mace and with the exception of Lee Bright. This has been asked of you in various manners by various FReepers over the course of time. You have yet to give me or anyone a legitimate (honest) reply.

Mace is no Palin.

Both ladies are athletic, quick-witted, are good public speakers, are continually attacked by weak men and other political opponents, are each committed to Christ by professions of faith, have nice smiles, are decent-looking, have strong-willed husbands and beautiful kids, are working to push the causes of independent thinking and Constitutional conservatism, have both been interviewed by Glenn Beck, etc., and so on. IOW, they compare quite favorably.

What was your point, again, Alinskyite? No one else is Palin. No one else is Nancy Mace.