Whether Bundy’s cattle were on public land is a separate issue but it provided the pretense to illegally take property and business.
The issue is that a man was almost thrown off his property at gun point and dispossessed of his business at gun point so that another business may benefit.
Without exercising our inherent rights protected by the 2nd Amendment this legally conducted criminality would have succeeded.
If you look past the surface, through the sheen of legality, there is a web of corruption with politicians, judges, administrators, all scratching each others backs.
Everything was “nice and legal”, but it was criminal.
NEVER DISARM.
“NEVER DISARM.”
Bingo. Without the patriots’ weapons,
...
no fed back-down.
NOW do we get 2A rights? Now do we understand!
Good post.
Everything was “nice and legal”, but it was criminal.
Needs to be repeated again and again
“Everything was “nice and legal”, but it was criminal.
NEVER DISARM.”
Best post on this thread!!!
Don’t know about a lot of places, but in rural Nevada there are no pussies! If this had gone “Waco,” I think the BLM would have lost.
The government acts as though we don’t understand they’ve stacked the courts with statists. Most Americans are plenty smart enough to read and understand the US Constitution for ourselves, and we see right through the malarkey some justices try to spin. So they put a bunch of statists on the courts and then make all sorts of rulings based on what? They’re making it up as they go. Again, it’s like they think we aren’t smart enough to understand their game. For example...
- Obamacare isn’t a tax and it isn’t an enumerated power of the federal government.
- Government can’t take our property unless it’s for public USE and we’re given fair compensation.
- Gay marriage is NOT a civil right per the 14th Amendment.
- No. They have no right to search us without a warrant and probable cause.
- The federal government has no enumerated power to control education within the states.
- Regulating interstate trade does NOT mean the government can tell you what you can and cannot grow on your own property.
The list is virtually endless, but I’m sure you’ve seen it all before. We are onto the statist’s game!
Pretty much sums up FedGov in general and Harry Reid in particular.