Given that the land is owned by the State of Nevada (my "buddy" Hanity says so), I don't see where the feds have any constitutional control over the land since it evidently wasn't purchased under the Constitution's Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I, or the eminent domain clause of the 5th Amendment.
So what constitutional clause am I overlooking?
“Given that the land is owned by the State of Nevada (my “buddy” Hanity says so), I don’t see where the feds have any constitutional control over the land since it evidently wasn’t purchased under the Constitution’s Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I, or the eminent domain clause of the 5th Amendment.
So what constitutional clause am I overlooking?”
The ‘clause’ hand written by the Federal government’s hand picked employees in black robes that let them do whatever they want.
Althou honestly the State of Nevada needs to get involved here and uses the publicity to make a real case against the Federal government’s hording of 85% of Nevada’s land and associated resources.
Far more than any other state:
http://www.ecowest.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Slide12.png
Nevada’s leaders should at the very least point out the unfair situation Nevada faces as a result, comparing themselves to say New York which enjoys control & access to of 99% of their lands.
The "I have a pen, and I have a Phone" clause.
