Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10

“Given that the land is owned by the State of Nevada (my “buddy” Hanity says so), I don’t see where the feds have any constitutional control over the land since it evidently wasn’t purchased under the Constitution’s Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I, or the eminent domain clause of the 5th Amendment.

So what constitutional clause am I overlooking?”

The ‘clause’ hand written by the Federal government’s hand picked employees in black robes that let them do whatever they want.

Althou honestly the State of Nevada needs to get involved here and uses the publicity to make a real case against the Federal government’s hording of 85% of Nevada’s land and associated resources.

Far more than any other state:
http://www.ecowest.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Slide12.png

Nevada’s leaders should at the very least point out the unfair situation Nevada faces as a result, comparing themselves to say New York which enjoys control & access to of 99% of their lands.


58 posted on 04/12/2014 3:08:11 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Monorprise; All
... The ‘clause’ hand written by the Federal government’s hand picked employees in black robes that let them do whatever they want.

While I agree with you to an extent, parents need to start making sure that their children are taught the federal government's constitutionally limited powers.

70 posted on 04/12/2014 3:19:12 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson