Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cherokee1

I heard the rancher say he owns the water rights to that land for another several years. Don’t know how that works, but he said he is the owner now.


171 posted on 04/12/2014 12:25:19 PM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Marcella

Owning the water rights would go along with owning the grazing rights which he claims his family purchased in the 19th century. That’s a little unusual but that far back could have happened. And owned is owned-—not rented or leased. His maintenance fee agreement predates the BLM at a time when the fees went to the local county. About 20 years ago the county quit accepting the payments but his contract predates that. He doesn’t mind paying the fee but wants to pay it to the county, not the BLM, per his contract. There could not have been a court order to destroy water works so if it happened somebody had better be lawyer shopping-—cuz he’s gonna need help ‘splaining himself.


206 posted on 04/12/2014 12:49:39 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson