Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

Some thing you are missing... Bundy had more land until the BLM took it away from him....


55 posted on 04/09/2014 9:23:23 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Tre Norner eg ber, binde til rota...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse

All he has to do is show a deed for this land and it’s over. But since he’s been paying lease fee’s proving he doesn’t own it we have a none story.


56 posted on 04/09/2014 9:28:41 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse

No, Bundy did NOT have more (as in own) land.

He USED more land. The more land was federal land. This is a common condition with ranching in the west. Some land you own, and some land you lease (range fees) but what you call your ranch is the sum of the two.

The fact is that the federal land he was using before the creation of the BLM to


60 posted on 04/09/2014 9:32:38 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse

“Bundy had more land until the BLM took it away from him....”

He had nothing, he was leasing and stopped paying the lease years before they shut it down.


61 posted on 04/09/2014 9:34:30 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse
No. The Bundy family never owned this land, and the federal government never took this land away from the Bundy family.

Bundy does not recognize federal ownership of land. Bundy believes that all federal land in Clark County, Nevada belongs to the people of Clark County, Nevada, and not the federal government.

80 posted on 04/09/2014 10:20:51 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson