Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

No, Bundy did NOT have more (as in own) land.

He USED more land. The more land was federal land. This is a common condition with ranching in the west. Some land you own, and some land you lease (range fees) but what you call your ranch is the sum of the two.

The fact is that the federal land he was using before the creation of the BLM to


60 posted on 04/09/2014 9:32:38 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

Well shoot... I guess you’ve got me. It’s just peachy that the Feds are using the BLM to prevent use of more and more land. Pretty soon, we’ll be eating vat grown tofu and living in high-rise cubicles.

You’ve won me over. Congrats...


66 posted on 04/09/2014 9:40:51 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Tre Norner eg ber, binde til rota...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
BUNDY CAN NO LONGER LEASE THE LAND.

The Feds hate individualists and the productive. They want him to move into town (Hairy Reid's Las Vegas) and become a GOOD tax slave/subject.

The guy's problem is that he lives too close to Las Vegas and within Clark County.

106 posted on 04/09/2014 11:22:23 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson