Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

That paragraph isn’t about it on a VM, it’s about your idea of them keeping all the OSes available for download for a fee. That has the OSes running straight up, which means they’ve got to be supported and patched and everything else.

If it wouldn’t be profitable there’s no reason to do it. MS is a business, they exist to make money, period. Customers that have very expensive hardware that can’t run the new OSes have had a long time to figure hoard equipment and copies of XP to keep that setup going. Nobody is forcing them to uninstall XP, they’re just not making patches for it anymore. If they want to be on new computers then they need to get with the OEMs and figure out why they can’t run the new OSes and fix it.


74 posted on 04/08/2014 1:42:55 PM PDT by discostu (Call it collect, call it direct, call it TODAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
"That paragraph isn’t about it on a VM, it’s about your idea of them keeping all the OSes available for download for a fee. That has the OSes running straight up, which means they’ve got to be supported and patched and everything else."

Read the last four words......they are "in a virtual machine".

What I posted said zip about keeping the full/original OS's, it was completely about versions designed to run specifically in a VM. It could be that the "old OS" would ONLY run in a very specific VM, tailored for that purpose.

82 posted on 04/08/2014 3:41:24 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson