To: SkyPilot
Technically they aren’t great, but damn if they don’t say something about their subjects. It’s like he tried to pain their souls rather than their faces.
9 posted on
04/06/2014 3:35:51 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(Richard Warman censors free speech.)
To: Slings and Arrows
10 posted on
04/06/2014 3:36:19 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(Richard Warman censors free speech.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Didn’t Bush say that he had looked into Pooty-poot’s soul and found it good, or something of that nature?
Despite that, he managed to capture those lifeless killer’s eyes in that portrait.
14 posted on
04/06/2014 4:06:12 AM PDT by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Technically they aren’t great, but damn if they don’t say something about their subjects. It’s like he tried to pain their souls rather than their faces. I absolutely agree.
21 posted on
04/06/2014 5:01:31 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: Slings and Arrows
Well Bush uses a stylized approach to his portraits. Its very interesting. He’s actually not bad. I think he has caught the essence of Putey. :-)
45 posted on
04/06/2014 8:23:07 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson