Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trapped_in_LA

I agree. I don’t like the ecigs because they are just too darn hipster.
But just because I don’t like something doesn’t give me or anyone else the right to say someone else can’t have them.


123 posted on 03/24/2014 1:36:30 PM PDT by envisio (Its on like Donkey Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: envisio

Thank you.


124 posted on 03/24/2014 1:37:36 PM PDT by RandallFlagg ("I said I never had much use for one. Never said I didn't know how to use it." --Quigley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: envisio
"But just because I don’t like something doesn’t give me or anyone else the right to say someone else can’t have them."

Red herring! Is anybody talking about an outright ban on e-cigs? No. They are just applying the existing bans on smoking in public places and age limits. That's all.

And this article points out that there are some safety issues with liquid nicotine that need to be addressed because they've already seen an increase in about 300 children poisoned.

132 posted on 03/24/2014 1:49:38 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: envisio
"But just because I don’t like something doesn’t give me or anyone else the right to say someone else can’t have them."

Red herring! Is anybody talking about an outright ban on e-cigs? No. They are just applying the existing bans on smoking in public places and age limits. That's all.

And this article points out that there are some safety issues with liquid nicotine that need to be addressed because they've already seen an increase in about 300 children poisoned.

133 posted on 03/24/2014 1:49:38 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson