Replies

My problem with the hijacking is... Where did they take it? How could they fly that far (to land) with no one seeing it on radar? And how do you hide a 777 AND keep that knowledge quiet? just doesn’t seem plausible.

And if they hijacked it to crash it in the open ocean...why? To what end? Terrorists like to advertise what they’re doing. A “terrorist” act that no one ever finds out about really isn’t a terrorist act.

That's what makes the case for this being a hijacking or a terrorist act so stunningly weak...hijackers and terrorists want publicity, for the most part. They want to bring attention to their cause. And there is little value in hijacking a plane and telling the pilot to take it to McMurdo Station in the Antarctic.

On another note...this General McInerney on Fox News needs to issue a retraction, at the very least. He has done a great disservice by fomenting the rumor that this plane was in Pakistan, when in truth and in fact, what's left of the plane and its passengers and crew are under 12,000' of water in the Indian Ocean. If I were Roger Ailes, I'd be on the horn to my news director, telling him that the only thing I want to hear General McInerney say on the air is that he was tragically wrong about this whole thing, and further, that he apologizes for leading any viewers to entertain the vain hope that anyone on that flight made it out alive.

I'm of the mind that our govt (and the other govts) know where that plane is and what happened. I do not believe anything being reported, because as many already know the media and govts are known liars and do not do investigative reporting anymore. They now report sensational stories, with their opinions and editorials.

This whole story has been suspicious from the get go. Why would the plane divert it's path (to Beijing) and then 12 minutes later, sign off like all is ok? If there was something catastrophic that happened,to cause the plane to divert it's path, why the "all right, good night" sign off? Why no calls for mayday? Why no squawking or whatever else one would do, to notify the plane is in danger?

Then, turning off the transponders had to be done manually, IN the cockpit, by someone who knew what they were doing. Boeing's engines have the technology to continue pinging, which they did, for another 7-8 hours after the transponders went off. So we know the plane was still in the air. Again, if something catastrophic happened, how could the plane continue to fly for another 7 hours?

Then the reports of the plane going up to 45K feet and then flew as low as 12000 feet before it dropped off the radar. And the planes flight path, based on the way points, show it was heading in the direction of Pakistan, which is about the same distance as Beijing, so the plane would have had enough fuel to go there.

The generals theory could be true. Who is to say that the Taliban (and Pakistani govt) weren't in on hiding that plane? I mean, didn't they cover up (or play dumb) that Bin Laden was hiding all those years, right outside their borders?

Maybe the plane did crash. But considering the "news" we are being sold, and how so many things just don't add up...anything, IMO, is possible.

Oh, and to those who question if it was a terrorist act, why has no one claimed it?

Well, if they did take the plane, and hide it somewhere, to possibly use for nefarious purposes in the future, why would they claim their “terrorist act” halfway through the plan?

Of course they aren’t going to say anything, until they’ve accomplished their terror.

#Justsayin