Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigdaddy45

Oh, and to those who question if it was a terrorist act, why has no one claimed it?

Well, if they did take the plane, and hide it somewhere, to possibly use for nefarious purposes in the future, why would they claim their “terrorist act” halfway through the plan?

Of course they aren’t going to say anything, until they’ve accomplished their terror.

#Justsayin


268 posted on 03/24/2014 12:54:58 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. ~ Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: Lucky9teen

Under your scenario, thats not terrorism; thats a hijacking. And again, the idea of hijacking the plane, and flying it for 5-7 hours with no one seeing it on radar is possible. I suppose. Theoretically.

Also, if the transponders on the engines put out a signal whenever the engines are running, as soon as the plane fires back up again, Rolls Royce will know. Unless they have a mechanic who knows Rolls Royce engines well enough to disable it.

If, if, if, if. Just too many ifs.


272 posted on 03/24/2014 1:01:13 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson