Forty years from now, all the young kids today are going to be grumpy old men yearning for the good old days of Coldplay and Arcade Fire while pointing out that the music of the 2050s is "utter garbage."
Posted on 03/22/2014 2:13:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Tony Bennett doesn’t have much patience for most modern music. The legendary singer, 87, told the BBC Radio 4’s Today program that most modern songs lack a “lasting quality.”
“The songs that are written today, most of them are terrible,” he said. “It’s a very bad period, musically, throughout the world for popular music.”
He added that today’s music industry leaders are more concerned with making money than making quality music.
“The corporations took it over and they want to make so much money and they don’t care whether the public likes it or not,” he said. “They think the public is ignorant, so their attitude is, ‘Don’t give them anything intelligent, because it won’t sell.’”
He also criticized what he sees as the music industry’s bias toward younger listeners.
“Today, record companies are failing because they are putting their accent just on the young, and I think that’s rather silly,” he said.
Bennett is a huge fan of one young pop icon, however; he’s collaborating with Lady Gaga on a new jazz album, Cheek to Cheek.
“She’s one of the best singers I ever heard,” Bennett told Parade.com in 2012. “She also plays great piano and dances very well. She’s an all-around great performer…I’ve met so many people in show business over the years and I’m very impressed with her. She’s one of the great talents coming up. She’s going to always surprise everybody with her artistry.”
Watch Bennett and Lady Gaga perform “The Lady Is a Tramp”:
Forty years from now, all the young kids today are going to be grumpy old men yearning for the good old days of Coldplay and Arcade Fire while pointing out that the music of the 2050s is "utter garbage."
I loved Cameo and P-Funk, myself.
The singer/songwriter model is the wrong model. Sure, it can work, but you don't often find both skills at the highest level in the same person.
Motown was great because the performers were separated from the writers.
Yes! That carried over for a time into the seventies, and it's what I miss.
FMCDH(BITS)
FMCDH(BITS)
The popular music of today is the best chart success industry money can buy!
Psst, the same people who are telling you how wonderful Obamacare is are the ones saying Lady Gaga is the new Elvis Beatle.
It’s the best popular music that a desk bound MBA can choose for you using an Excel spreadsheet!
More planning goes into the marketing plan and development of popstar musicians and their images than ever went into Obammycare.
Tony lost me when I found out what a Libtard he really is.
Obama loving DemocRat, dumb as a fence post.
The songs of today are only terrible if you like melody, harmony, good lyrics and you can let your children listen to them. Otherwise today’s “music” is great.
Indeed, Excel is just a start of it, then comes SharePoint, and finally the Normandy stage of the campaign - PowerPoint! On to Berlin!
When talking about music I don’t really care about a musician’s politics.
Who wants to FOLLOW the trends signing the next big thing when you can TELL the people what is big?
The newest trend, I’ve just read in the Biz & Finance section of yesterday’s WSJ (I don’t know if it’s available online, but you can try finding it by searching on the author’s name: Hannah Karp), is for Swedish songwriters, who have had successes writing hits for the likes of Jennifer Lopez, Britney Spears and others here, to develop their own stables of performers. Since the death of the CD and the rebirth of the single (alas without a B side), songwriters have been hurting, earning royalties only when they hit on a hit. Previously (and I suppose still), songwriters collected for each of sold album’s fillers, whether radio played them or not.
The new racket is to permit the public to make “fan made videos” but then contact Google’s Youtube and demand revenue (in the form of revenue from a paid ad before the clip airs).
So in essence, the studios are profiting on the work of others in the absence of any court order giving them ownership of the work.
The song owners can demand that the song audio be stripped but they have no legal claim to the video work of someone else.
The perfect country song..David Allan Coe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_qfujQ_jTQ
Don’t be offended...I like C&W. :) Especially classic C&W.
Beatles??
I’ve always been rather partial to bands with an excellent writer who could write to and work in harmony (pun?) with the strengths of an excellent singer, whose abilities said writer probably understands more rationally than the singer him or herself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.