Replies

1 posted on 03/17/2014 12:37:23 PM PDT by xzins

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last

To: xzins

It’s like I went back in time. I swear 5 or 6 years ago there was an article very similar talking about disbanding the Air Force and rolling it into Navy.

162 posted on 03/17/2014 5:30:51 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; Defender2; ...

Active Duty/Retiree ping.

167 posted on 03/17/2014 5:44:57 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Not to take sides between the Army & Air Force; but from a Constitutional stand-point, it would be far better to place the Air Force as a semi-independent branch under the Navy. That is because of the language in Article I, Section 8,. which limits Army funding to a period of two years at a time.

Because of the time frame involved in provisioning a Navy--and since World War I an Air Force--there is no time limitation on Naval appropriations.

William Flax

224 posted on 03/18/2014 10:38:45 AM PDT by Ohioan

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794