Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

I’m more thinkin the rise in altitude was deliberately done for the longevity of the flight......I’d be interested to see the assumed glide path possibles from a decent from 45 k feet


57 posted on 03/15/2014 6:07:16 PM PDT by advertising guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: advertising guy

What’s the mean? Why would it help the longevity of the flight?


59 posted on 03/15/2014 6:10:45 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: advertising guy

It might be good for glide duration, but not for fuel consumption... oxygen that is needed for combustion starts getting kinda scarce up that high, density drops and there isn’t as much lift.. everything has to work harder to stay flying as you get higher


70 posted on 03/15/2014 6:20:13 PM PDT by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: advertising guy

I was wondering about that too.....specifically, whether a higher altitude could have gotten the plane to Africa.


91 posted on 03/15/2014 6:48:09 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson