Posted on 03/11/2014 3:51:38 PM PDT by tcrlaf
The Civil Aviation Department of Hong Kong has received a pilot’s report that a large amount of debris was spotted in Vietnamese waters.
The pilot, flying a Hong Kong to Kuala Lumpur plane, says the debris is located about 60 kilometres southeast of Vietnamese city Vung Tau, some 500 kilometers from where the Malaysian jetliner lost contact with air traffic controllers. The department has submitted the message to the relevant authorities.
Except JimRob has met me multiple times. I worked security at the March for Justice, CPAC and other events. My 4 year-old daughter sang at the House Impeachment Rally.
Find me something that 200 people saw and the government said it never happened and later admitted it did happen. This should be fun.
Area 51.
Oh and I gave the Ft Marcy Park/Vince Foster tour
How many people saw the stealh fighter before it became common knowledge? thousands
How many knew about spy satellites, tens of thousands
The nukes? Well everyone in the foreign country knew about them EXCEPT the majority of the US Military and American public. Unless of course they knew enough to recognize the gold film in the F16 canopies was intended to protect the electronics after delivery, worked on the computer system to pre-plan combat missions or had access to see the blast radius maps which extended out to about 30 km. Yeah the American public learned about them when the Stars and Stripes published an article.
Now that is close but no one had to see an airliner full of people die to hide that secret.
As to Flight 800 they tried to duplicate what they think happened on the flight but could not do it. Even under ideal labortory conditions.
I haven’t met you. I don’t believe you exist.
Man you'll be in demand when Hillary 16 cranks up!
My Occam’s Razor is James Kallstrom, who headed the FBI investigation onto Flight 800.
Here are some facts:
http://flight800doc.com/fact-checking/fact-checking-james-kallstrom/
Looks like the FBI agents were not so sterling in this investigation.
Then after the investigation wrapped up, Mr. Kallstrom retired and, after 35 years as a gumshoe, became-—wait for it—an investment banker!
That’s just as plausible as a center tank explosion.
BTW, the actual 24 year old 747 that was TWA had one of the most spotless maintenance records of any 747 built.
And if waiting on the hot tarmac caused the plane to “cook”, there would be 747’s popping like popcorn in every desert area like Saudi Arabia.
And that has never happened.
“Find me something that 200 people saw and the government said it never happened and later admitted it did happen”
I spent 10 years in the military doing things that never happened in places which didn’t exist. All of which are public now but I have about 60 years left on my non-disclosure.
No it ain’t close, it is a direct refute.
Thats two you lost. Wanna go for three?
Maybe I don;t
Advantage: Lenhart
You suck at this game, Norm.
I know. Let’s have a spelling contest.
And how many of those witnesses saw the plane itself? I ask because all those who claim to have seen a 10 foot long “missile” never claim to have seen the 250 foot 747 that it presumably hit.
Occams Razor
You're exactly right. And that's why we know, for a fact, that "they" DID find the shooter.
Now, why do you think they'd tell US that they found the shooter?
You’re a daisy if you do ;)
If you knew about anything like this, I recommend you do not take it to your grave. That would be a terrible indictment on our military. It ranks up there with “I will round up the guns of Americans if ordered”
The investigation revealed a VHF antenna connector had come partially loose and shorted inside a fuel void when he transmitted to me acknowledgement of a frequency change to O'hare approach.
In '66 or so, in central Michigan about 10PM I saw what I was certain was a jet coming down in flames about 2 -3 miles east of me into some woods. The Sheriff got hundreds of calls about it, all with roughly the same description. It was a meteor that came down in Ontario, hundreds of miles away.
Bottom line, I have perused/studied literally of accident reports and have great respect for the professionalism and expertise of the investigators. And I know for a fact that what you see isn't always what is there.
Well I'm not expert, but a ten foot missile on top of a ball of fire starting from sea level is a little bit easier to see than a gray-painted underbody of a large plane moving without any contrails at 10K feet.
Did you know that if you hold your thumb up at night, you can cover the whole moon with it? That means the moon is an optical illusion and not an actual celestial body.
Right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.