Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
So instead of anthropogenic global warming, it was mongolithic global warming?
Do these people even read the same talking points?
Sheesh.
2 posted on
03/10/2014 5:26:46 PM PDT by
ImaGraftedBranch
(...By reading this, you've collapsed my wave function. Thanks.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ah, another Wanker study...
3 posted on
03/10/2014 5:27:43 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Shhh....we’ve got to hide the Medieval Warming Period.
4 posted on
03/10/2014 5:28:11 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Climate does change.
Rome was at its peak during a warm period.
The Dark Ages were a cold period.
Leif Erickson sailed to the New World during a warm period -- Britain had vineyards then.
The Little Ice Age last from about 1500 to 1850.
Are we getting warmer now? [shrug] I think opinions differ -- but the key concept is that Climate does change. It's not our fault, and we can't "fix it". We're just along for the ride.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Climate change helped make the Mongol Empire possible.It made the Al Gore empire possible.
6 posted on
03/10/2014 5:29:55 PM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Turkic migration eastward was done in SUVs?
7 posted on
03/10/2014 5:30:33 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Oldeconomybuyer
But he couldn't have done it without a change in climate. Okay. But who caused it?
8 posted on
03/10/2014 5:31:17 PM PDT by
Dartman
(CDN PM Stephen Harper may not be perfect, but we don't have to be ashamed or embarassed of him.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The PNAS study came from research done by the tree-ring scientists Neil Wanker at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and Amy Hessl at West Virginia University. …
Neil who? LOL!
9 posted on
03/10/2014 5:31:44 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Oldeconomybuyer
So if Al Gore had been around to ban the internal combustion engine, Genghis would have been out of the mongol horde business. OOO-K.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
11 posted on
03/10/2014 5:42:42 PM PDT by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh, for the love.........
12 posted on
03/10/2014 5:44:08 PM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maybe 1000 years from now when documents are finally declassified, historians can tell how Obama-Khan with his allies Effin’-K and Al-Gore were able to rise to global hegemony because of climate change.
13 posted on
03/10/2014 5:45:54 PM PDT by
bakeneko
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Didn’t I see this same stuff on the history channel 20 years ago?
14 posted on
03/10/2014 5:52:09 PM PDT by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh, I LIKE THAT!
What a POS traitor.
17 posted on
03/10/2014 6:11:10 PM PDT by
Monkey Face
(Don't try to win over the haters. You're not the Jackass Whisperer.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
So, the climate was changing, and was affecting mankind in the 1200s, but now we shouldn’t expect that?
Adaptation is the only answer. We cannot control climate. We just need to adapt to its changes.
19 posted on
03/10/2014 6:40:18 PM PDT by
Rocky
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Actually, a series of betrayals and such made ol’ Ghengis the man as he is known today.
Him and his mongol buddies, being very very good at doing that mobile war stuff, and being fearsome as all get out, drove the rise of the Khan.
21 posted on
03/10/2014 7:02:47 PM PDT by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Global warming would be nice—worth putting a guest yurt out in the yard.
25 posted on
03/10/2014 8:47:29 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; Revolting cat!
George Bush must’ve had a time machine.
26 posted on
03/10/2014 9:23:33 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; GeronL; Revolting cat!
The trees—some of which were still alive—were ancient, some more than 1,100 years old. Old trees provide a living history book of the climate. During warm, wet years, the trees grow more, and the rings inside the trunk that mark those years are wider. The opposite happens during dry years, when the rings would be narrow. Note the use of the word "WERE" next to "still alive". Researchers killed old growth trees in the name of SCIENCE!
Sacrificed to Gaia to amend for the sins of Western man.
27 posted on
03/11/2014 4:57:32 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; SunkenCiv; dennisw
I wonder if it occurred to these scientists that by documenting the Medieval Warm Period they are undercutting one of the articles of faith of the climate change alarmists.
Maybe they know that if they connected the dots their funding would dry up.
BTW, this warm period also coincided with the Renaissance of the 12th Century in Western Europe.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
