Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpsb
It is always a good idea to review what you are posting and ask yourself “Would I post that if I had to put my real name to it?”

Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; [unless the peasant responsible refuses to put his real name on it]...

Fixed it for you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

49 posted on 03/08/2014 8:24:46 AM PST by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: kiryandil

We don’t want the government to be a nanny-all. We shouldn’t try to ban every bad thing.


52 posted on 03/08/2014 8:27:04 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
Freedom of speech does not mean that you are free to slander someone. It protects you from criminal prosecution by government. Individuals can sue you for slander if you falsely accuse them and employers can fire you if you embarrass them.

There is of course a time to be anonymous, when exposing a powerful entity of criminal behavior. Usually that is done via leaking info to an interested press. If the "troll" wishes to accuse someone of being a pedophile then he should put his name to the charge and back it up with evidence.

57 posted on 03/08/2014 8:53:53 AM PST by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson