To: Sub-Driver
He is more deserving than Obama.
7 posted on
03/05/2014 8:59:13 AM PST by
KeyLargo
To: KeyLargo
8 posted on
03/05/2014 9:00:17 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: KeyLargo
He’s started less wars than Obama.
11 posted on
03/05/2014 9:01:40 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: KeyLargo
He is more deserving than Obama. He should refuse to accept it because he won't eat Cracker Jack.
12 posted on
03/05/2014 9:05:28 AM PST by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
To: KeyLargo
He is more deserving... It's not about deserving, it is about what they expect the nominee to do in the future to deserve it. In Ø's case, they expected him to destroy the US, and he has... thus, for the Nobel committee, he deserved the nobel.
17 posted on
03/05/2014 9:16:59 AM PST by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson