Skip to comments.
Discussion Thread: Texas Primary Today (3-4-14) ..first hand reports, observations, comments..
one man's opinion...
Posted on 03/04/2014 7:00:48 AM PST by ken5050
I was hoping one of the Texas FReepers would start a thread, but didn't see one. The Texas primary is today..several interesting races, but the BIG ONE involves Cornyn. When you vote...let us know what you heard/saw? What's the weather like down there?
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2014gopprimary; 2014midterms; abc; gopprimary; johncornyn; texasgov; texasprimary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340, 341-356 last
To: SADMILLIE
There are no Republicans in the Austin Metro Maybe 2?Not true, the Austin Metro area includes four counties surrounding Travis County, most of which are full of conservatives who had fled the Austin city limits. Williamson County, for instance, is part of the Metro area but is solidly conservative.
341
posted on
03/05/2014 8:28:59 AM PST
by
Bear_in_RoseBear
(Gentlemen may cry, "Peace, peace," but there is no peace. The war is actually begun!)
To: Jane Long
What is the potential now for the Dem to win with a Clintonian plurality if Dems can put a lot of money into a libertarian candidate (like Va. governor)?
342
posted on
03/05/2014 8:33:39 AM PST
by
nascarnation
(I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
To: nascarnation
343
posted on
03/05/2014 9:06:10 AM PST
by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
To: JLAGRAYFOX
I too am beginning to believe that “Ms.” Davis will lose, but I will have to wait until November 4 to be sure. Millions may yet come to her candidacy. Never underestimate this kind of “celebrity” figure. As far as those Hispanic counties voting against her, the will be for her in the fall. They were on March 4 voting for the intraparty opponent with an Hispanic name.
344
posted on
03/05/2014 2:28:17 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: Jane Long
Lyndon B. Johnson got 59 percent in the general election of 1960 against John Tower, who gained exposure for the special election of 1961. The big beneficiaries of Cornball’s success are McC and Graham.
345
posted on
03/05/2014 3:54:57 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: Jane Long
The press declared Eisenhower’s 55 to 56 percent in 1952 a “landslide”.
346
posted on
03/05/2014 3:55:38 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: WilliamRobert
Stockman gave up his House seat to make the race for which he had little chance to begin. That’s why I voted for him.
347
posted on
03/05/2014 3:56:48 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: harpu
Also Governor Reagan won with 59 percent in 1966 or 1970, and I believe President Reagan polled 59 percent in 1984. These were called landslides.
348
posted on
03/05/2014 3:58:29 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: Theodore R.
You didn’t vote for him (Stockman) for his smarts, I see ;)
349
posted on
03/05/2014 4:22:35 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
To: Theodore R.
The press. Oh yeah, they always get it right.
350
posted on
03/05/2014 4:23:59 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
To: Theodore R.; harpu
Also Governor Reagan won with 59 percent in 1966 or 1970, and I believe President Reagan polled 59 percent in 1984. These were called landslides. Against considerably stronger candidates, was his point.
Stockman was vigorously defined (defiled) by the MSM from the jump. As they did to Sarah Palin, as they did to the Rombot, as they did to Newt. Et cetera, et cetera.
To: txhurl
Divide et impera. I see the hand of Karl Rove here. Who told Stovall he had a chance, with even less name recognition than Stockman?
I'm not talking about splitting the anti-Cornyn vote here, I'm talking about splitting the anti-Cornyn/RiNO money ..... that repeat of 2012, plus the huge overspending on Cornyn's campaign and the exuberant lying, =
KARL ROVE.
To: lentulusgracchus
No, now, neither Jess Unruh nor Walter Mondale were considered particularly “strong” candidates.
353
posted on
03/05/2014 7:55:22 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: Theodore R.
"Also Governor Reagan won with 59 percent in 1966 or 1970, and I believe President Reagan polled 59 percent in 1984. These were called landslides." You, Sir, are an idiot using Reagan's wins as an example!
354
posted on
03/06/2014 4:58:01 AM PST
by
harpu
( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
To: Theodore R.
No, now, neither Jess Unruh nor Walter Mondale were considered particularly strong candidates. They had the support of their undivided party, which doesn't apply in this race, in which the GOP-e faced a pre-blackguarded insurgent candidate from the dissident Main Street (no Money) wing.
Not impressive of Corny, considering he dropped all that $$$ on a not-terribly-strong candidate the press hates.
To: corbe
356
posted on
03/17/2014 2:48:39 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340, 341-356 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson