If you can’t “see” the underlying “messages” and the artificial emotions tied to “correct” concepts.....I can’t help you.
Take the Jimmy Carter (the Satanic “Apartheid State” guy) promotion in the Argo movie. Not so subtle.
Take the “King’s Speech” and the promotion of puerile “emotions” over actual “Reason” to understand the underlying emotions. Sure-—some Reason was used, but not without the elevation (climax) of profanity, by a King, no less.
I am also a person who never ever heard my father use a foul word in front of females, ever, and he lived to be 87,
You might think I am picky-—and I certainly am......but I’ve read about script writers, who were denied by producers, because of the lack of the profane/Satanic ideas included in their script.
It is very subtle in some movies (granted)....but it is always there, unless it is a Mel Gibson or a Kirk Cameron (who are reviled in Hollywood) or an ‘outcast” , Look how Gibson portrayed homosexuals in his Braveheart. Can’t do the Truth in Hollywood.
Like “Mr. Smith goes to Washington” even in “Hollywood” back in the day of Jimmy Stewart, it had to be “successful” by word of mouth because the elites hated it. (It showed Truth, which is VERY dangerous to Hollywood/eiltes). I saw the interview of the producer’s son who was not part of the cabal, who controlled Hollywood.
John Wayne had been interviewed about scripts which he hated-—and thought were absurd and stated so to the Producers—”Who would portray whole towns with men as being frightened and hiding for their life-—to depend on one person for “saving” the whole town (AGAINST 3 OUTLAWS-—LOL)
John Wayne argued that Americans (family men) (in the 50s) were not like that (cowards), and the men wouldn’t allow 3 men to terrorize a whole town. But perceptions and emotions and ideas are the purpose of Hollywood. And they have an endpoint.
Hollywood tried to destroy John Wayne, but it didn’t work. He said that the people believed they knew his character from all the movies and wouldn’t fall for the lies Hollywood was putting out about him.
It is all a part of “Dialectical Materialism” (Marxism)——to advance one way of “thinking” and it is normalizing a vulgar ignorant people and totalitarian State, albeit “happy” entertained slaves who believe in any irrational idea that is pumped into them, and a State that supplies constant stream of sex/drugs for the “happy”.
It is a culture of “White Noise” to distract and entertain and keep from learning the Truth/God and being truly Wise and living a profound Life——you “watch” others in dysfunctional situations, which inculcates false perceptions of the Truth and keeps from true education and interaction.
It is rare that the perceptions promote “Truth”. Research Edward Bernays and you will understand the power of Wundt and the “marketing” of ideas/pictures to the masses. It determines the correct “perception” and “emotions” of our children, especially those who are glued to the tube/videos/computers and never interact with their parents.
Argo didn’t promote Carter. Did you see it? They played an excerpt of a speech he gave about the incident at the end to give it a historical sheen.
Your objections to The King’s Speech are so trivial as to not even bother mentioning. Suffice it to say that the elevation of emotions over reason goes back centuries. The Frank Capra film you mentioned was actually held back by the Breen Office (Hollywood Censorship board) as ‘anti-American propaganda’ - showing corrupt government officials was controversial back then. Wayne worked steadily throughout his career and got an Oscar at the height of the counterculture so it’s safe to say there was no attempt to ruin him.