Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PJ Media Symposium: Will Ted Cruz Be a Plus or Minus for Republicans in the Midterm Elections?
PJ Media ^ | February 27, 2014 | PJ Editors

Posted on 03/02/2014 10:42:53 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 03/02/2014 10:42:53 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

^


2 posted on 03/02/2014 10:46:53 PM PST by rdb3 (Get out the putter, this one's on the green.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If only we had someone else to energize the base...

3 posted on 03/02/2014 10:55:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Cruz is just another politician. He has already stabbed us in the back on amnesty, and the more secure his power becomes, the more he’ll vote with the leftards.


4 posted on 03/02/2014 11:02:03 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsc; neverdem
One writer criticizes Ted Cruz for being a limelight seeking opportunist and the next skeptically dismisses Cruz as a non-entity.

The important thing, is that all these people are talking about Ted Cruz.

My bias: I support Ted Cruz and I accept the premise laid down by Michael Walsh:

The party in D.C. will go on, spending like there’s no tomorrow because, in fact, there is no tomorrow. And then it will stop.

Accepting that premise, the only question which remains is how do we shape the "culture" to accept the charisma offered by Ted Cruz on the assumption, contrary to poster dsc that Ted Cruz will sell us out and indeed has already sold us out. My reply is that if Ted Cruz ain't your man, you have no man and you have no hope. Either we go with Cruz and Mike Lee or we stay with what we have which is Groundhog Day and the flat-out insanity of repeating the inputs over and over again expecting different results

J. Christian Adams addresses the issue head-on: will the Ronald Reagan message sell again or are the Rinos correct and we have to go along to get along? The answer is clear, if we go along,

there is no tomorrow. And then it will stop.

Whether a bareknuckle conservative message can still win elections is an argument that is rendering the Republican Party in twain but it is to me perfectly clear after the experience of the Bush administration with Republican majorities in both Houses that unless we have a bareknuckle conservative government we will have no tomorrow.

So the argument about winning or losing on conservative values is moot, if we don't win on those values we lose anyway.


5 posted on 03/03/2014 2:03:43 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I think the real question is one of whether the Republicans will be a plus or minus for the Republicans in the midterm elections.

With only a few voices crying out in the Washington wilderness, and seemingly none save that few to challenge the illegal acts of this administration, what reason would the average schmuck have to quit watching the ongoing saga of Honey Boo-Boo and go cast a ballot for people of either party who are just going to screw him over anyway?

The Republican Party has built one heck of a track record for throwing Conservatives under the bus--so much so that many Conservatives do not feel they have any representation in DC from either party.

Short of galvanizing voters into voting so overwhelmingly for a conservative candidate that the candidate prevails against the imported multiple and undocumented voters of the Left, the status quo will prevail, because those in the party, and to a similar degree, the electorate, want just that.

6 posted on 03/03/2014 2:28:20 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

And when did he do that?


7 posted on 03/03/2014 2:34:05 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Amen...!


8 posted on 03/03/2014 2:40:14 AM PST by swampfox101 (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Think about it rationally for a moment. How many voters are likely to step into a booth next November and ask themselves, “Whom would Sen. Cruz want me to vote for?’’ It’s much more likely they will be asking themselves, “Who is Ted Cruz and why in the world am I thinking about him?’’

In my case particularly, Bill Straub could never be more wrong.

9 posted on 03/03/2014 3:12:55 AM PST by Gaffer (Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

My thoughts exactly. Possibly he is confusing Cruz with Rubio.


10 posted on 03/03/2014 3:14:17 AM PST by Gaffer (Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dsc
You are full of crap. Cruz hasn't stabbed us in the back on amnesty.

/johnny

11 posted on 03/03/2014 4:04:06 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Cruz has never stabbed us in the back on amnesty. He is the best thing going for us on the Right.


12 posted on 03/03/2014 4:23:23 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I hope he is a big MINUS for Republicans and a plus for Constitutional conservatives in the primaries.


13 posted on 03/03/2014 4:39:58 AM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If Ted Cruz isn’t good for the Republican Party than neither am I. I’m already half gone. No new RINOs.


14 posted on 03/03/2014 4:56:25 AM PST by McGruff (Every night has it's dawn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

The Establishment has made inroads into CPAC. The RINO goal, naturally, is to get the primary into their hands and out of ours. They are using even conservative media play alongs to start the process.

Probably there are plenty of sour grapes over Cruz. but mostly the RINO crowd is very nervous where Cruz is concerned and need to bounce him around, before post time. The point is to weaken Cruz, among his own.

Getting supposed conservatives at CPAC to go wobbly on Cruz would be of prime importance to the Establishment Club.

Rand Paul has proven no threat yet to the old boys club. Having played poker with McConnell, Rand may have bought some time with the RINO machine, but they want more milquetoast, like big government Jeb, who seems unalarmed by anything on the earth, ever. Or, noisier versions, like Christy, but not serious conservatives, not Cruz.


15 posted on 03/03/2014 5:10:12 AM PST by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

FIRST: Ya gotta define “Republican.”

Right now, the term is almost meaningless.


16 posted on 03/03/2014 5:37:35 AM PST by Flintlock ( islam is a LIE, mohammed was a CRIMINAL, sharia is POISON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

great observation


17 posted on 03/03/2014 5:39:20 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dsc

I don’t recall Cruz ever favoring amnesty or voting for the left Dems/RINOs proposals.

I see you’ve been here on FR for many years, but that posting comes across like something a far left troll would make.


18 posted on 03/03/2014 5:43:26 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It’s actually easy to answer this question.

1) Voters adore a clear, concise message, even more than the content of that message.

2) Only the media likes and demands that elections are beauty contests and horse races. The public wants knock down-drag outs, a clear choice between one side or the other.

3) Political losers are those who try to run with the other parties’ platform. “Moderates” only win when the voters are exhausted by radical change and just want peace and quiet, to be left alone, and to not see the BLOFUS every time they look at the news.


19 posted on 03/03/2014 6:35:48 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc; o2bfree; 12th_Monkey; 230FMJ; TWhiteBear; painter; tbw2; Ricebug; parthian shot; mrsmel; ...

Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!


20 posted on 03/03/2014 7:27:52 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson