I'm trying to understand your violent reaction to this column, so will you please explain which part(s) of it you disagree with?
This column is a pseudo above-the-fray ‘backtrack’ of his recent columns. I’m guessing he’s gotten a lot of flack over those, as well he should. I know I certainly don’t agree with him - at all on them.
On the one hand, telling us recently that we have to win elections to change things, and then in this article stay above it all and explain that Boehner just can’t speak English or other such nonsense is absurd. It is apologism under the guise of impartiality.
I’m tired of hearing about him. And I’m tired of hearing how “he’s conservative.”