Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom

http://www.fiercepharma.com/story/whistleblowers-merck-hid-declining-efficacy-mmr-shot/2012-06-26

http://www.forbes.com/sites/gerganakoleva/2012/06/27/merck-whistleblower-suit-a-boon-to-anti-vaccination-advocates-though-it-stresses-importance-of-vaccines/

Is Forbes good enough for you?

How about this one?

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/47851.htm


69 posted on 02/14/2014 7:48:23 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes

All of those say basically the same thing, and none of them tell exactly what the details of the alleged “cover-up” are. What is the motivation behind the “whistle-blowing”—employees who saw something underhanded going on, or former employees trying to get back at Merck for terminating their employment? If they did see something underhanded, then why didn’t they take their concerns to the FDA, instead of filing a class-action lawsuit? **If** there was falsification of data, who was doing the falsifying—the company Merck, or a Merck employee who wanted to make himself look better by falsifying or misrepresenting data? There are just too many unknowns here.

When I try to Google Merck and mumps, the results are almost all from non-reputable websites, and there are no recent updates on the allegations.


76 posted on 02/14/2014 10:45:43 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson