Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thetallguy24

No fan of the Bush dynasty here but this article really stretches on the vitriol by going back to 1994 on a youthful indiscretion at age 17 when George P. was likely thinking with the little head rather than the big head when pursuing a relationship.


29 posted on 02/13/2014 12:17:50 PM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bird45

I don’t think its vitriol. I think the author points out at the end that you have to truly vet candidates, including about their past. After all, this is a very powerful position. Candidates are public figures and need strict scrutiny.


30 posted on 02/13/2014 12:22:22 PM PST by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: T-Bird45
Let me run this buy you, and lets see how much objection you have to it.

No fan of the Obama administration here but this article really stretches on the vitriol by going back to 1994 on a youthful indiscretion at age 17 when Barack was likely thinking with the little head rather than the big head when pursuing a relationship.

It all goes to character. I can think of a number of issues with Barack Obama early on, that should have told us he was not presidential material. I wouldn't waste two seconds taking someone to task for reminding us of any of it.

32 posted on 02/13/2014 12:41:07 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Amnesty is job NONE! It isn't even the leading issue with Hipanics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson