My comments had to do with a reaction to a justification of thuggery in office because the thug opposes homosexuality.
Thuggery by its definition means a breach of law, a breach of the rule of law and that has an awful lot to with the Constitution.
Incidentally, whether we agree with the Supreme Court's decision or not (and I do not) it is perfectly legal to engage in sodomy in private in America. This is a ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States and until we depart from Marbury vs. Madison it is our constitutional law and, as such, has a great deal to do with the Constitution.
