[nathanbedford]

“Homophobia”??? Really??? What does that have to do with the Constitution?

My comments had to do with a reaction to a justification of thuggery in office because the thug opposes homosexuality.

Thuggery by its definition means a breach of law, a breach of the rule of law and that has an awful lot to with the Constitution.

Incidentally, whether we agree with the Supreme Court's decision or not (and I do not) it is perfectly legal to engage in sodomy in private in America. This is a ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States and until we depart from Marbury vs. Madison it is our constitutional law and, as such, has a great deal to do with the Constitution.

[ilovesarah2012]

Obama doesn’t oppose homosexuality, he celebrates it. And he ignores the Constitution at will.

[annalex]

it is perfectly legal to engage in sodomy in private in America

You mean among adults. It is perfectly legal to engage in sodomy in private in the RF as well.

Understand. Putin IS a thug. The gay propaganda to minors law is, however, a law passed by the parliament of the country rather than decreed by Putin. I happen to think it is a good law. It could be that it is applied in a thuggish way, like any other law in the RF, but that doesn't seem to be your point, does it?