How Obama Will Win The 2014 Election – With Help From Karl Rove

grasstopsusa ^ | January 20, 2014 | Don Feder

[TexasCajun]

..and not just Karl Rove!

GINGRICH: HILLARY WON'T BE STOPPED BY 'NITPICKING SMALLER ISSUES' LIKE BENGHAZI

[Mike Darancette]

And some people will give it away before one vote is cast. You beat them by wining primaries.

[sickoflibs]

The GOP ‘losing’ 2014 is a recurrent theme here lately (talk radio too), yet the Dems will be losing more than a few seats in 2014, seats that the GOP will pick-up.

So later on this year ‘losing’ will be re-defined as ‘not winning all seats in both houses’ if that’s what it takes to claim it was a loss.

In fact I heard Levin a couple of weeks ago pull something similar “Why didn’t the GOP win every Senate Seat in 2012?”

[nascarnation]

I’m not as negative as this view.

Remember as the election arrives, 65 to 85 million folks are going to find their employer-based healthcare is no longer what it used to be.

[2ndDivisionVet]

[ClearCase_guy]

It is the job of the GOP to make sure that this country is perpetually ruled by Liberals.

[existentially_kuffer]

Reads like a Democrat insider.

[Deb]

Rove is a strategist who is always looking for ways to achieve and maintain a Republican majority so the Left can be defeated. Just because you disagree with him over how to do it doesn't make him the enemy.

Malcontents like you are the bigger threat because you pretend there's a group of perfect conservatives out there and everyone else must be purged.

People like you will insure an Obama win in '14.

[tennmountainman]

Independents won’t matter after the GOP passes amnesty.
Tens of millions of conservatives will abandon the GOP.

[tennmountainman]

Great pic Vet!

[cripplecreek]

Kind of like the GOPe claim that tea partiers cost us races in 2012. They point to a couple of high profile races (which they largely helped destroy the tea partiers in) while ignoring the races tea partiers did win.

[Lucky9teen]

Fun Fact For Those Happy To See End Of Disastrous Obama Era

The 2014 Midterm Election cycle is about to be unleashed, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. If Democrats lose Congress, the Obama era is effectively over as the current president becomes a likely increasingly disenchanted seat warmer for his successor. Here’s a fun fact that bodes very well for those of you who would like to see that happen.

Going back to 1962, presidents with a sub-50% approval rating have lost an average of 44 House seats in midterm elections, according to data compiled by Republican pollster Bill McInturff.

According to pollster Bill McInturff, data going all the way back to 1962 shows that when a president’s approval rating drops below 50%, they can expect to lose on average, 44 House seats – what is effectively a landslide victory for the opposition party. Republicans already have the House locked up tight though – it’s the Senate they want. So look for this data trend to deliver that very thing.

Yesterday, Capitol Hill sources indicated as many as TWELVE Senate seats are now up for grabs. If Republicans were to take just seven or eight of those seats, the entire power structure in Washington D.C. would shift to the right, and the Obama White House would be isolated, rendering it an impotent progressive-socialist island unto itself.

Ready to fight back against the Age of Obama reader? 2014 is yet another, and perhaps even more critical, opportunity to do so. -UM

[sickoflibs]

RE :”Kind of like the GOPe claim that tea partiers cost us races in 2012. They point to a couple of high profile races (which they largely helped destroy the tea partiers in) while ignoring the races tea partiers did win.”

The finger pointing was both ways.

Romney's 47% video slip was about as embarrassing as Tod Akin. Both were gifts to Dems.

[Impy]

Nope.

[man_in_tx]

We really do not have two parties: We have one hard-core, committed, win-at-all-costs party; and, then we have an ersatz Party that serves as “fly paper” for the real party, draining — in the name of “political reality” — millions of dollars and millions of votes from those who genuinely wish to opposed the one real party.

Mr. Rove: You are not on my side.

[molson209]

Obama has the IRS , NSA etc etc ,he does not need Karl

[Ghost of SVR4]

As you said to someone else on another thread:

Oh shut up.

You've been around long enough to know the Republican party is now PART of the problem in this country. I don't want ANYONE else that Rove likes driving the direction of the country; including the current crop of idiots pushing for amnesty.

[rcofdayton]

I understand what you are saying but sometimes I get the feeling that the only Republicans he wants are RINOs.

[RitaOK]

What you identify is in the air, a sense of hopelessness, given the ominous advances of influence of Islam in the West (did you read of the favorable treatment of Islam in Alabama public school textbooks, made available for free by the Muslim movers and shakers) and then also the real shell shock Americans are experiencing when realizing more than half of the country is this extent of ignorant, suicidal, bankrupt of patriotism.

I hearken to the movie documentary by Dinish DeSouza and understand these upcoming elections will likely be our last hurrah, before all hell breaks loose. We are in a holding pattern watching events unfold, not unlike the populations of Britain and France at the cusp of the war years.

Seems we have no leadership in place to the measure of Churchill, or DeGaull.