Posted on 01/06/2014 7:50:12 PM PST by Eleutheria5
Iranian lawmaker, cleric, and Majilis (council) member Mohammed Nabavian declared Monday that Iran does need a nuclear bomb - to destroy Israel.
Iran would be able to build a nuclear bomb in two weeks if it gets access to 270 kilograms of 20 percent [enriched uranium], 10 tons of 5 percent, and 20 thousand centrifuges, Nabavian stated, according to Iranian media reports. We are not looking for a nuclear bomb, but having a nuclear bomb is necessary to put down Israel."
Regarding Iran's resumed diplomatic relations with the US, Nabavian stated, "If Obama asked for a meeting five times before the visit to New York and several times during the visit, it's because over these eight years measures were taken [by Iran] and, as a result, the United States [now] needs Iran."
"In Syria, the U.S. did not manage to attack and was humiliated. In practice, Obama was humiliated because he did not stand up to Iran, and hence it is necessary to meet with Iran's president to show that he is a strong man and tell the world: I brought Iran to the negotiating table after 30 years."
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
Check out the new trailer that was made for me, unasked. Just a gift from a reader.
How islam can be brought to an end.
I wrote that on Lawrence Auster's (R.I.P.) website.
"We're going to find out, sooner or later, if Abdul will pray, to a glowing crater." (Or smoking.)
"Radical Islam is an insane murder cult, 'moderate' Islam is its Trojan horse in the West."
They used to call nuclear physics, the Jewish science, (and certainly Hitler shot himself in the foot by driving so many experts out of his reach.) I dont think this is true anymore. The brainswith numerical gifts now seem to devote themselves to finance.
Funny. I have always felt that way about Islam.
It all depends which hemisphere of the brain dominates. Physics, I guess, are old hat by now, while economics and finance are still mysterious (and tend to engender conservative thinking). Medicine seems to be an all-time favorite, employing a balanced use of both hemispheres.
Labotomy might help, too.
:)
Or maybe the old theory of Arthur Koestler, that the marriage of Talmudic scholars sons to bankers daughters produced a good lot of brainy kids, when were then caught up in the new math and physics of the 19th and 20th century, as a new spiritual quest. Or maybe it is that some guys like Dick Feynman are just intrigued by puzzles. He was also a great safecracker! At Los Alamos, no combination lock was safe from his fingers.
True, but fully half the safes had the exact same combination 2-3-5...
He actually was able to open a locked bank vault. When he was about 12 he was taking apart and repairing radios and gadgets that neighbors brought to him. He invented{ his own calculus when he was in high schools rather than the rote stuff in the textbook. Sort like Newton himself did, thinking of it as a tool to answer problems. Very deep into the concrete world. Which is why Niels Bohr lied him. Bohr was, I think, much deeper into reality. Deeply curious about sensible things.
He also used to leave the secure facility through a hole in the fence and enter through the front gate, giving him the record of having enter far more times than he left.
It was the only way he could persuade them to fix the damned fence!
Just the fellow to head the investigation of the Challenger disaster. He had the instincts of a great engineer as well as the insights of a great physicist. Wonder if the creator of McGiver had him in mind?
Good essay. Makes me want to stoke up the Enola Gay and drop one on Mecca right now, except I don’t know how to fly.
I’m not suggesting it as a course of action, I’m just suggesting what I think might happen if Russia, India or Israel are hit in a major way.
And that it might spell the end of Islam as we’ve known it since Mad Mo crawled out of the bat cave and barked at the moon.
Israel and India really must become bestest buds. America cannot be relied on any longer, and Russia is too Byzantine and calculating to ever be relied on by anyone ever. Same with China. Beware of super powers altogether. But Israel and India are both beset by the same bunch of crazies, and we both have a nuclear option that might have to be exercised along the lines you suggest.
The difference between Al Shanker and the gal who now heads the AFT?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.