Nah
it will be polygamy
A Self-Styled ‘Gay Revolutionary’ Offers a Challenge to Straight America:
“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, ...wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our holy gods are handsome young men. ...We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed...”
Michael Swift - Boston Gay Community News - February 15-21, 1987
Yes and in short order.
We have already had polygamy and we’ve tacitly tolerated it. The thing is that it’s acceptable for men to have mistresses and for men to have ‘long term affairs’ so long as they don’t commit to these women and the children that might occur from these relationships. But if the man commits and calls his mistress or his fling another ‘wife’, oh, then that’s bad.
We’ve also long had polygamy in the form of a man having a wife and family, he gets divorced and marries another woman and starts another family, and so on. That’s a form of socially acceptable polygamy.
And let’s not forget Hugh Hefner and his three live-in women or Charlie Sheen and his two live-in women. That’s also polygamy.
Finally, there’s the legion of urban black males (I’m loathe to call them ‘men’) who consider it a point of pride to have a harem of women with whom they have lots of babies who are all supported at taxpayer expense.
That’s all polygamy.
I say this not to support polygamy but to point out that what you’re concerned about has already been in existence right in front of you for decades.