Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What would a U.S.-China war look like?
The Week ^ | Eugene K. Chow

Posted on 01/01/2014 5:28:41 PM PST by Farnsworth

Imagine this: In the early morning, a barrage of more than 1,000 Chinese ballistic and cruise missiles bombard Taiwanese civilian and military targets.

As the U.S. Air Force stationed in Okinawa prepares to rush to the aid of its sworn ally, Chinese cyber attacks wreak havoc on America's air defense and targeting systems. A second volley of ballistic missiles detonates in space, destroying critical military satellites, while a third rains down on the base, damaging jets and leaving runways unusable.

Meanwhile, a U.S. carrier strike group led by the USS George Washington has launched from Japan and is steaming towards the Taiwan Strait. Without the advanced warning and additional data supplied by satellites, the group's missile defense systems are at a disadvantage against the Chinese "carrier killer" missiles that are streaking towards them. Defense systems do their best, but a few missiles still hit their mark, leaving the USS George Washington's flight deck unusable. America's awesome air and sea power has been sidelined.

(Excerpt) Read more at theweek.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoasia; china; chinesemilitary; redchina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-153 next last
To: Farnsworth

Like Oregon, dumBO would surrender it to keep from losing all his donors in California.


61 posted on 01/01/2014 6:24:45 PM PST by depressed in 06 (America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Our appetite for Chinese made garbage has fueled Chinese expansion. If it were to suddenly stop, a massive economic contraction would have to occur. To avoid such an economic implosion, China would have to A.) find new markets for their inferior quality merchandise immediately or B.) put themselves on a war footing immediately. There may be an option C but I don’t see it and, IMHO, option A is just thrown in there for the sake of argument because there is no other market for their crap. It would be option B.


62 posted on 01/01/2014 6:27:02 PM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

We are at war with them, we cancel our obligation. Kind of the bankers way of saying ef you.


63 posted on 01/01/2014 6:27:59 PM PST by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

Well here’s a good reason to throw more money at the defense industries.

China is trying to assert themselves globally. So, it’s to be expected. Is conflict inevitable, yepper. Could it escalate?
Probably but I believe unlikely.

The US cannot be defeated and occupied.


64 posted on 01/01/2014 6:32:58 PM PST by theneanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: trisham
It would be a catastrophe.

Some good would come out of it, i.e. all of this gloBULLism and so called Free Trade and offshoring nonsense would end ONCE AND FOR ALL.

65 posted on 01/01/2014 6:33:37 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

Let’s start selling them Chevy Volts.


66 posted on 01/01/2014 6:33:43 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham
It would be a catastrophe.

Not for Russia or India...

67 posted on 01/01/2014 6:35:28 PM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

When China fights this war they will not leave it conventional they will lay waste to our cities.


68 posted on 01/01/2014 6:36:30 PM PST by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

We didn’t use nukes in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan, what makes you think the USA would EVER launch a nuke in anger again?


69 posted on 01/01/2014 6:37:00 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

I’m glad you think our military is full of PMSing women and faggots...lovely. Our military and technology is far superior to theirs. What about China’s military do you think is superior? Who, in power, thinks China is weak?


70 posted on 01/01/2014 6:39:24 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

there are plenty of guys still alive who faced them in Korea 50-53. Chinese commanders have no regard for their soldiers lives and send them en mass. Chinese soldiers are hopped on some weed - and the bugles — Their strength is in their numbers.


71 posted on 01/01/2014 6:42:13 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

And thanks to the one child policy and the resultant surplus of unmarried males, a war to thin out their numbers to avoid them causing trouble might actually be a benefit.


72 posted on 01/01/2014 6:47:51 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

Bring ‘em on. Once ashore here, they are toast. No, not because Bambies watered down defenses stop them but because WE stop them. 2nd Amendment. Then we stop the crazies in DC.


73 posted on 01/01/2014 6:50:07 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theneanderthal

I have no confidence in the will of the American people


74 posted on 01/01/2014 6:52:01 PM PST by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Ha!


75 posted on 01/01/2014 6:52:42 PM PST by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Perhaps one, maybe. As weak as the will of the American people is, I’d think we’d fold under a conventional attack


76 posted on 01/01/2014 6:54:54 PM PST by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth
The Chinese are not that stupid.

They will take Taiwan by attrition through disputes mediated by the UN. The US can no longer get sanctions through the Security Council if Russia or China veto. The US will not be allowed to use force to defend Taiwan if our government wanted to, and it is too risky to do so unilaterally as a rogue aggressor nation.

China is too smart to give the slightest legal provocation to US assets, and will just dime Taiwan to death with minor dispute after minor dispute.

It's only a matter of time and the Chinese have forever, having figured out how to grow their economy and not crash it. Taiwan is done, but we don't have to be.

77 posted on 01/01/2014 6:55:56 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

Their space program is up and coming, but they have plenty of successful examples they have used to advance their technologies, along with outright intellectual theft, which is the Chinese way. Not to belittle their achievements.

Their ambitions and plentiful funds at this time are admirable, even though they are due to our excess and distraction. If their economy survives their own “bubbles” and continues to advance, we have nobody but ourselves to blame for falling behind.


78 posted on 01/01/2014 6:57:34 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

the Obama military is nothing but a social experiment.

I’ve “discussed” this issue many times on other sites with people who feel China is nothing to worry about.


79 posted on 01/01/2014 6:57:55 PM PST by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

quantity over quality. Same is building for China’s military.


80 posted on 01/01/2014 6:59:08 PM PST by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson